• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there some major difference between it and the console versions? Otherwise, why should it be priced lower? I mean I’m not going to buy it anyway, so I have no skin in this game, but it seems reasonable to charge the same thing for the same game across the board.

    • fer0n@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes and no. The mobile game market is very different from PC/console. The size, age group, how much users are willing to spend etc. Pricing isn’t just about the product, it’s about the market as well as many other factors.

      So far, the majority of PC games are around that price point, on mobile most games are f2p. I can’t think of any other game with a price of $60.

      I’m not saying it should be cheaper, but I’m curious to see how much of a success this will be at that price point combined with iPhone 15 pro only. It’s certainly an interesting move and different from what I’ve seen so far for mobile phone pricing.

      I’ll get it on PSVR as soon as that’s out.

      • Fester@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For games like this, the touchscreen experience is just inferior to using a controller, and the thought of buying a controller for a phone doesn’t even occur to most users.

        That plus the fact that most phone games are so horrible and borderline abusive have really driven home the assumption that phone games are supposed to be cheap and low-quality.

        Some decent well-known peripherals and more high-quality games could change that over time, but I think it will be a while before it doesn’t look bizarre to have full-blown console prices for phone games.

        And you just know that if it becomes normalized, we’re going to see generic casino and puzzle games jumping on the premium price bandwagon, but still trying to sell gems and shit.

        • flames5123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can use a controller on the iPhone. The iPad Pro has an M1 chip, just like the MacBooks. You can even cast to your TV and play that way. Sure, it’s not going to be the exact same as console quality, but iPhones have been better than the PS3 for a few years due to engine optimizations and better hardware.

  • generalpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it comes to iPads and Macs, paying $60 with the ability to access the game on different platforms + cloud saves may make it a compelling buy for the platform.

    Now, if only Apple could beef up the AppleTV enough to be able to handle this game like a proper console (or at least close to it). It’d be an excellent experience given that controller support has arrived on all of these devices.

  • doctorcherry@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s some negativity about the price due to it being much higher than usual for a mobile platform. But I hope that it does well. Despite having good hardware games on iOS, iPad OS and TV OS are really lacking in quality. If this game shows there is a viable market for AAA games then that could change.

    • TheYang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not convinced that mobile is a good platform for longer-term games.
      want to spend 5-10 minutes waiting on the bus while flapping a bird or crushing some candy? makes sense to me.
      Resident Evil? I’m not so sure.
      On the other hand, Fortnite seems to work, so what do I know?

      Anyway, I think Phones have become powerful enough that they should be able to get docked to a Desk/TV. Then it makes more sense to me again, a Phone could be the only computing device most people use

  • who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The game is almost 20 years old. My great grandchildren are going to be seeing ads for skyrim and RE4 rereleases into the 22nd century

  • .:\dGh/:.@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Seems like a NOPE for anyone who only has an iPhone, but if you’re deep into Apple ecosystem with a Mac or an iPad, it seems reasonable if it becomes available in all of your devices and your save data is synced across devices, but if not, then it’s a bad deal no matter how you put it. Imagine running it on the AppleTV.

    Honestly I don’t think you’re gonna drive users with a console to buy it again if it looks the same or worse.

    I think this kind of first releases is a wait-and-see. If it’s performance is on par with consoles, and there is sync saves, it may be an excellent deal.

    It’s not that you can buy RE4 on Xbox and play it on PC too with a single purchase, can you?

  • fer0n@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not what I was expecting tbh, usually mobile game variants are cheaper even if it’s the same game. Not saying it should be, but that has basically been the norm so far.