I know, right… Damn foss enthusiasts, you show 'em sources in order to get some cheap publicity, and those bastards immediately start raising a stink over you slightly attempting to fuck them over with licensing
Llamas ass, only slightly
fucked overwhipped.
I mean they don’t understand SW, Licenses and Git. It’s all out there now…
Hey at least we got some commercial secrets and licenses. It’s always nice to get those.
For starters, it was never “open source”…
Did they comment on why it was deleted? I didn’t see anything in the article. I recall the consensus was that they made so many mistakes the only way to fix it was deletion of the repo.
I also saw in one of the comments of the Arstechnica article that the one who pushed for open-source wanted to clean up the code before publishing. Management said no, the entire team got fired/left, and suddenly the code got published with all that commercial stuff left in. Sounds about right.
I must say, this whole shitshow has been pretty funny to watch :)
I’m completely out of the loop. What happened?
Is this what whipping the llamas ass looks like?
