[ifixit] We Are Retroactively Dropping the iPhone’s Repairability Score::We need to have a serious chat about iPhone repairability. We judged the phones of yesteryear by how easy they were to take apart—screws, glues, how hard it was…

  • BeanCounter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It contacts Apple’s servers to “authenticate” the repair, then “pairs” the new part to your system so it works as expected.

    Mmmm… DRM for your replacement parts for over $1,200 devices that you already paid for. That’s what this society needs.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think calling it DRM is incorrect. I think Apple and its audience belief you should be able to tell if a replacement part could be counterfeit, and possibly have a security vulnerability as a result. However, it should be a one-time notice that a user can dismiss and continue using the phone’s complete functionality.

      For example, if someone replaces a camera module, Face ID could technically be compromised. That said, the security for Face ID is on the device itself, and replacing the module with a third-party one, as long as they was made aware it may not be as secure as the original part, let them do what they want with their own device.

      EDIT: If it were me, I would want to know a part in my phone is not directly from Apple, but I would still want the ability to determine if I want to continue using the phone like that or straight up replace it. It should be the user’s decision.

      • BeanCounter@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree to some extent. And I believe that’s how ingenuine parts were treated by iOS before now.

        But locking its functionality? That’s some bullshit.