I want to setup a camera monitoring for my house and some rooms. I need to bee able to view the cameras remotely and and also do recording if possible. I could find some camera brands like dahua cams but having briefly tested them they. Seem to rely on acwmtralized cloud and proprietary visualization software.

What are you recommendation? This is not a professional setup I would at max have 3 cameras.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Zoneminder was cool when it was the only game in town, but didn’t it save “videos” as a folder of JPEGs of frame grabs?

      • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yes and no. You can capture frames, stream the output to the local OS or export the feed to be embedded in a website if you like. Also you can put it on the backend of another NVR and use it for long term storage, backup, compression and storage for later investigation. All of that allows for using higher resolution cameras and multiple feeds on smaller drives like a two 4TB disk ZFS stripe or something similar. I often reuse consumer desktops for it when price sensitive clients need security cameras, or remote access to a system already in place.

        https://zoneminder.readthedocs.io/en/1.32.3/userguide/viewmonitors.html

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago
    • TPLink Tapo line - I own those, requires internet / cloud access for setup, then can be viewed by any ONVIF capable software, VLC etc. You can cut their internet access and they mostly work, however timestamps and some features may break randomly;
    • Reolink / AMCrest - no internet required, can be setup offline AND have a WebUI that allows full control over all functionality. Check the details of specific models, may vary a bit.

    AMCrest is most likely be most offline friendly brand. Here’s a testimonial from another user:

    I’ve been using Amcrest and foscam IP cameras at my home for the past several years. I have then connected to a no internet VLAN with an NVR. The models I’ve been using have an ethernet port and wifi. Setup was connecting to the ethernet port and then accessing the web ui in a browser to configure settings (most importantly turning on RTSP or ONVIF feeds)

    • dragnucs@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It would be best if I don’t have to create an account or install a proprietary app to perform the initial setup.

      I still haven’t found any AMCrest camera being sold near me. I found some Hikvison.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Reolink / AMCrest - no internet required, can be setup offline AND have a WebUI that allows full control over all functionality. Check the details of specific models, may vary a bit.

        … NO internet required, no apps, nothing. Just a WebUI on a browser.

  • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wifi cams can be jammed. Lorex wired cameras and zoneminder with a tailscale VPN setup.

    https://www.lorex.com/products/1080p-8-channel-1tb-wired-dvr-system-1?variant=42389948792982

    https://wiki.zoneminder.com/Dummies_Guide

    https://tailscale.com/kb/1348/guides

    If you don’t trust tailscale you’ll have to get some sort of ddns for wireguard and punch through your router

    https://www.noip.com/free

    https://www.wireguard.com/install/

    Let me know if you want further context.

    • 🅿🅸🆇🅴🅻@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I second the idea of a VPN instead of directly exposing devices or software to the internet. Requires more work and learning but it’s more secure. I would argue that well-known VPNs are more scrutinized and pentested than any camera software ever.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    The cheapest way I found was getting some TP-Link Tapo cameras that have RTSP and Onvif, and run them under frigate.

    Set them up in the app, cloud and all, then add them to your frigate, now block internet for them.

    Those cameras are anywhere from 25 to around 50 dollars each. Best bang for the buck I could find.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m working on one called Soteria. It’s still early in development, but I’m focusing on both privacy and cloud availability.

    It uses any WebDAV store to upload footage, but it’s designed to work best with my own WebDAV server Nephele. This lets it upload footage to any S3 compatible blob storage, end to end encrypted.

    That way if your cameras go offline, you can watch the last footage they were able to upload.

    Like I said, it’s in early development, so it’s not yet ready to use, but I’m going to be putting more work into it soon and try to get it to a place where you can use it.

    It works with any V4L2 compatible camera, so laptops, webcams, and Raspberry Pi cameras should all work.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Any camera that uses the V4L2 system on Linux. So, mostly webcams.

        One important note is that IP cams are not supported yet, but I’d like to add support for them.

    • dragnucs@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes I may, I don’t have it setup now, but I do have an ultra PC that might run it.