• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Palin alienated anyone vaguely in the middle, but on the other hand she had at least some particular support that she brought distinct from McCain (basically Tea Party folks that were not particularly excited by establishment republican nor McCain).

    Vance doesn’t have any particular support, he only gets indirect support for people who are “republican no matter what” or “MAGA all the way”, but those people were already covered by Trump. Even in his own state his margin of victory was much slimmer than the other republicans that swept Ohio in 2022, and Ohio’s not even a state considered to be a risk to Trump’s campaign.

    He was just a tremendously bad choice with no strategic benefit. The VP pick should somehow provide some coverage for demographics not hit by the presidential candidate, and Trump instead went with someone with very limited popularity that is a strict subset of people already supporting Trump.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      True, he only brings the few techno autocrats. Though that does bring money (though some of that money, like Elon’s, would have gone there anyway).

      But he was picked because he’d do what Vance wouldn’t and overthrow the election.

      • norimee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        he’d do what Vance wouldn’t and overthrow the election

        Pence, Vance, shitty Underpants…
        same, same but different…

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      She also brought in the evangelicals because she was one of them. And she had the same false piety the other evangelical darlings have.