• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    4 months ago

    Looks cool as hell. Here in NJ a bunch of NIMBY pricks have been fighting offshore wind because it “ruins the view” which I find laughable. Seeing clean energy being produced makes me smile, who cares if there’s a windmill on the horizon.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So just for context.

      Fixed wind turbines can only really be put in in 60m depth or less. Water that shallow is usually close the coast though there are some exceptions like the dogger bank, but that’s rare.

      If you are 100m off the ground you can see 36 km out to sea. (Or be visible 36 km from shore).

      The EEZ of countries, where you can install wind turbines, is 370km from shore. Currently (new tech) there seems to be floating offshore capable of operating at 1km deep waters.

      If floating wind takes off. Visibility might not be an issue at all. Wind speeds are higher and more constant out out sea. It’s a win, win, win. If it can be made cheap enough.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Visited a jersey beach recently. I’d vote to put turbines up across the whole fucking coat. I don’t care.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m more intetested how much per kW it produces cost, and the maintenance cost over its life span. It has to answer the question is it economical to build and maintain.

    • SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is true, but investing in research and subsidizing its production is how we drive costs down. We’ve done a really incredible job of getting clean energy costs down from where they were, but there’s no need to slow our efforts down now

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This could very well. Floating wind is expensive wind, so you could think of this as two turbines for the installation cost of one, or you could think of it as one pylon that produces double the power.

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    The hell does “single-capacity” mean here? The article doesn’t specify.

  • Kualk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    How much energy do they spend to keep this floater in place?