• TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Elon has all but admitted that the hyperloop was just a distraction to derail California’s public rail plans, and now that that ship has sailed he doesnt give a shit about hyperloop anymore. The Hyperloop concept is literally just a tool that Elon uses to prevent development of public transport in California so that people will buy more teslas instead.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Hyperloop seemed impossible form the get go. It had so many issues that are easily solved by… Not putting people in vacuum tubes

      • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        Here let me try to solve all of it’s issues:

        1. Get rid of the vacuum idea to reduce complexity and points of failure.

        2. Move track above ground to reduce manufacture/maintenance costs.

        3. Make the “pods” longer and chain multiple pods together to increase efficiency.

        Wait a minute… 🤔 🚉

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nah, we can’t have that, it’s boring and works. We need exciting and impossible

    • Skvlp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      A major flaw in our societies is that we allow jackasses like that to come into positions like the one Musk has. Fuck Phony Stark!

      • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Literally all I want is for my government to manage capitalism instead of capitalism managing my government.

        I am certain that Elon will try to co-opt Trump’s cult following and be his political successor when Trump finally kicks the bucket, and that legitimately terrifies me. Elon will run for pres in the next 20 years I’d bet on it.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      This happens in most European countries as well, I believe?

      It works fine as long as the private companies are held accountable for their shit and the high-level planning is done by public offices.

      It breaks down when there are no consequences for budget or deadline overruns, or the actual deliverable failing to meet requirements, because obviously private companies are gonna fleece the tax payer.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      Public employees are almost always not the highest quality and tend to be overpaid, why is it bad to have private companies do the work?

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I work in a large corporation, I can assure you that the same kind of people in the same proportions in corporations as in governments. You really should not let low resolution ideologies impose their make beliefs on your world.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          I used to also, and I understand the issue, but the mega corps will still be more efficient than the government. This brings up the other issue of how the government funds all the tax dollars to large corporations and also props them up with regulatory protections.

          • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            It really depends what you mean by “efficient”. But even if you go with “profit maximizer” that’s still an ideological truth that falls apart easily for most human endeavor. Since both organizations are made of the same kind of humans, have the same basic technology and access to resources (when not crippled in some way). When you add on top non monetary social goals, task more complex than “deliver commodity at lowest cost and max profit”, especially if you consider externalities, tgen saying " corporation are more efficient" as a blanket statement for use in all cases by default, it seems to me this is an ideological statement, really, an article of faith more then anything else.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Its not an ideological statement, it is a comment on the structure of the organizations and how they have to work to survive. Corporations need to do things efficiently or they disappear, the reason large companies are able to be so inefficient is that they are propped up by the government. But the big corporations still have to be more efficient than the other giant companies or their business gets taken.

              When it comes to the government they can have irrational requirements and ways of doing things, and since they allegedly are beholden only to the voters (who dont have a clue what is happening) then they can be as inefficient as they want. An example that is non monetary is how the police will investigate themselves and find they did nothing wrong, they only have an incentive to protect themselves and their own people.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s an article all right! But it’s from 5 years before the article I posted, and it’s just detailing what China THOUGHT was going to happen.

        Here it is 9 years later and it turned out they were wrong.

        It’s okay for countries to make mistakes. We air on the side of not wasting money. They air on the side of preparation. They have more money to waste than we do so good for them.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What happened is that vast majority of these ghost cities have been filling up, and as a result of massive investment into housing 90% of the population in China owns their homes now. Meanwhile, US wastes billions on its constant invasions of other countries. Iraq alone cost over 3 trillion. Your regime errs on side of wasting absurd amounts of money on crimes against humanity while ignoring the needs of the people living in burgerland.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    China managed to overbuild high speed rail, they got so good at it. Their whole system is built to incentive huge infrastructure projects. Which has been good, but now they’re getting way into the diminishing returns.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Very good point and one that people often forget. It’s literally impossible to build high speed rail without first becoming an authoritarian dictatorship.