OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 months agoI hope this clears things uplemmy.mlimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up189arrow-down112
arrow-up177arrow-down1imageI hope this clears things uplemmy.mlOneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareRhynoplaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·5 months agoAccording to the chart, I’m a material Purist, but I’m very flexible on methodology.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoCame here to say the same… What is an interesting finding. I wonder how many people are in each camp. Maybe we can get some data by infighting in a pseudonymous forum.
minus-squareRhynoplaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoNeed some more people to chime in, but I think the chart is flawed. Maybe I’m wrong, but I can’t imagine many people would consider Harry Potter a science, but physics is not. Seems more like a flexibility scale. “start in the top corner and see how far you can go until you think, no, that’s not science.”
minus-squareOneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months ago Maybe we can get some data by infighting in a pseudonymous forum. Excellent idea, lol
minus-squareMonstera@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoSame, but I can go to material neutral if I keep my methodology pure
According to the chart, I’m a material Purist, but I’m very flexible on methodology.
Came here to say the same…
What is an interesting finding. I wonder how many people are in each camp. Maybe we can get some data by infighting in a pseudonymous forum.
Need some more people to chime in, but I think the chart is flawed.
Maybe I’m wrong, but I can’t imagine many people would consider Harry Potter a science, but physics is not.
Seems more like a flexibility scale. “start in the top corner and see how far you can go until you think, no, that’s not science.”
Excellent idea, lol
Same, but I can go to material neutral if I keep my methodology pure