ModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agoOhio GOP Senator Says 'Civil War' Needed If Trump Loses.www.commondreams.orgexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1530arrow-down114
arrow-up1516arrow-down1external-linkOhio GOP Senator Says 'Civil War' Needed If Trump Loses.www.commondreams.orgModerateImprovement@sh.itjust.works to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square101fedilink
minus-squarekescusay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up295·11 months agoSuggesting that a war should be waged against the democratically-elected government of the United States seems… Well, it seems kinda treason-y to me. Just a smidge.
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up172·11 months agoHey now, treason is very specifically defined in the constitution. Oh and yeah, that’s the constitutional definition. This is treason.
minus-squareOlhonestjim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·11 months agoHey treason is when Democrats do anything I don’t like which means anything
minus-squareCatma@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up26arrow-down1·11 months agoIts only real treason if it comes from the Treasony region of France. Otherwise its just called being a rebel.
minus-squaremad_asshatter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 months agoThe Champagne virus is elusive.
minus-squareChainweasel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·11 months agoI miss when that mattered…
minus-squareThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 months agoYeah this kinda does seem like it might cross the line and be actionable
minus-squareSerpentPeaked@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·11 months agoIsn’t this sedition, not treason?
minus-squareThunderWhiskers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoTechnically yes, but it’s really just semantics and treason sounds sexier.
minus-squareFreefall@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoDoing the definition of treason is AT LEAST treason-adjacent!
minus-squarehopesdead@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoBut you need either that person or two witnesses to admit to it in a court in order to convict.
Suggesting that a war should be waged against the democratically-elected government of the United States seems… Well, it seems kinda treason-y to me. Just a smidge.
Hey now, treason is very specifically defined in the constitution. Oh and yeah, that’s the constitutional definition. This is treason.
Hey treason is when Democrats do anything I don’t like which means anything
Its only real treason if it comes from the Treasony region of France. Otherwise its just called being a rebel.
The Champagne virus is elusive.
bubbling rebel
I miss when that mattered…
Yeah this kinda does seem like it might cross the line and be actionable
Isn’t this sedition, not treason?
Technically yes, but it’s really just semantics and treason sounds sexier.
Doing the definition of treason is AT LEAST treason-adjacent!
But you need either that person or two witnesses to admit to it in a court in order to convict.