• dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    So, if I’m reading this right it’s basically just a 17 paragraph essay that boils down to, “Sorry we suck at CSS and it took us a decade to finally get around to rooting out all the random shit from 2014 that was hard-coded to display as rgb(0,0,0) or whatever, which was a capability that in retrospect we really shouldn’t have handed out like candy?”

    The TV Tropes wiki has managed to have a built in dark mode for at least the last 7 years. TV Tropes. Come on, guys.

    I’m baffled by the section about “making a shortcut that darkens all the colors on the page.” I’m positive that’s the intent of that entire blurb, to dazzle people with bullshit in the hopes that they won’t ask Hard Questions, because no competent designer would ever try such a thing. It is a self-evidently moronic idea. You don’t fuck with elements you didn’t create and don’t control, like images and color swatches.

    There are only really two viable possibilities, here:

    1. If arbitrary user definable, hard-coded colors in content are permissible, you’ll have to accept the fact that the cards will fall where they may and some instances will inherently be suboptimal in either light or dark modes, or…
    2. Accept that you won’t allow users to hard-code colors into anything outside of specific elements where that usage is valid, so users will just have to suck it up and pick from a list of preapproved color combinations with light and dark mode renditions.
    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Isn’t #2 the only option?

      Websites specifying color for foreground (or background) and assuming browsers will use whatever color they’re expecting for the other has always existed, and still exists

      If you’re getting fancy and specifying colors, you can’t cheap out and not specify all colors

      If the browser ignores all your colors at that point, then it’s displaying as the user intended

      If you only specified some of the colors, it’s a bug of the website

      • jpeps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are actually things websites can do which may be more common than you’d think. At a high level you could convert all the custom colours to HSV format and slightly lower the value and saturation according to some function. This is fairly common for images.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Like how amazing an innovation in NYC the technology which is… Plastic trash cans! With lids!

  • Agrivar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve always been kind of curious: am I weird because I prefer light mode for web pages with a lot of text to read? Or is it more of an age-gated thing, like older people who grew up reading printed texts only prefer what’s familiar to them? I’m fine with YouTube (for example) having a black background and dark theme, but I even browse Lemmy via old.lemmy.world in light mode!

    • N3Cr0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Light mode is likely just your personal preference, and there’s nothing wrong with it.

      I used dark themes/color schemes, long before there was a dark mode for everything. I was surprised when it finally became a thing and the new generation of dark themes was flawless (good bye unaddressed bright backgrounds which make everything unreadable!). So I can continue sitting in the Dark while not being blinded by a bright screen.

    • cestvrai@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Light mode is pretty hard on the eyes in dim lighting, the same way dark mode is in full sun. Health-wise, it’s best to decrease the amount of light as bed time approaches and that includes screens beaming light into our face.

      My computer defaults to light mode every morning and then I toggle dark later in the day when it becomes the more comfortable setting. So, for me it’s not really about “preference”.

      Very happy to have dark mode Wikipedia for late night queries!

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m an old fogey who grew up reading physical books and newspapers but I absolutely need dark mode on backlit displays. I despise light mode.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      How old are you? I’m in my early 30s, definitely grew up with computers most of my life, and internet almost as long, but also read plenty of physical paper books. I greatly prefer darker color schemes.

      That said, I’m also a software developer so I’m a bit biased and learned long ago that dark mode is much easier on the eyes when coding for hours on end, so maybe I’m just used to it.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      I hate dark mode, but it’s because I have a pretty bad astigmatism. Dark mode makes all text look like several mirror images swimming around each other, whereas light mode is fine.

      • Waveform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        ^That’s my issue with it. My astigmatism is so bad that when I look at stars there are rays coming off of rays… branching, pretty much. The moon makes several copies of itself. Light mode is much easier to view.

    • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Or is it more of an age-gated thing

      Depends how old you consider old, maybe? Computers back in the day were pretty universally light text on a dark background. VIC-20 was an exception but then even Commodore backpedaled on that with the 64. But you might have had a different experience and are only remembering things like Mac OS or Amiga, or Windows, and maybe that has influenced your preference. 🤷‍♀️ To each their own, anyway.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Having read lots of books, I tend to prefer printed text a lot. Yet I still use dark mode as much as possible; it’s the glare. It’s irritating to read something on a white, glaring surface. Paper doesn’t have that.

      I’ll read Wikipedia on e-ink, but on LCD I’ll use dark mode.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Light mode:
        Cons: blinds you when it’s dark, is grating on the eyes, looks terrible
        Pros: can be used as a flashlight in a pinch

        Dark mode:
        Pros: looks cool, doesn’t blind you, doesn’t hurt your eyes, easy to read.
        Cons: cannot be used as a flashlight

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are times I prefer light mode but dark mode feels better designed.
      A few days ago I switched to light mode because it was too sunny outside and switched right back after I was done. The Android UI was unbaerable for me.

      • cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Exactly, I toggle via keyboard shortcut depending on lighting conditions. Super nice to have proper dark/light mode support, especially if it can use the system setting.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I prefer light mode because dark mode gives me a raging headache in under 10 minutes, not enough contrast or something, I’m not sure. It’s bad enough that if I’m pairing with someone and they use dark mode I’ve gotta frequently look away or do something like a shared follow mode where I use a light theme on my end - it sucks.

      And maybe the science is old now, but in HS I did a report on eye strain and light backgrounds are typically better across the board. But who knows now.

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m with you on this. I prefer a dimly lit light mode to dark mode even at night. The white text always seems fuzzy and uncomfortable for me.

      • cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Light mode in a well lit room, dark mode in a dim room. It solves the contrast issue in both cases. Try it :)

        I toggle via keyboard shortcut depending on conditions.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It depends a lot on your screen, and your lifting situation. Black on white is better in day light, white on black is much better on LED screens (as opposed to backlit LCD or CRT monitors).

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      No. Dark mode is just a new hype that’s why it gets so much traction. None of it’s alleged benefits can be scientifically proven, it’s nothing but personal taste.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s easier on my eyes. Which is anecdotal, but a large enough portion of the population use dark modes for the same reason. That is not coincidence, and it’s not something I’d write off as merely being hype.

        There’s nothing new about dark mode either. Wikipedia is just slow in the uptake. Besides Wikipedia, dark modes have existed for more than a decade.

          • Tattorack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            My whole personality? The fuck you smoking to be so hateful towards dark mode? We’re literally here talking about it. You decided to join in with a weird ass take.

  • thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can’t imagine a scenario in which a person avoided using Wikipedia all their life till now just because things looked a bit brighter on screen.

    Dark mode makes things easier for its existing userbase (practically anyone with an internet wanting to learn) but that’s that

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The irony of me opening the article and being immediately blinded by the eyesore white page.

  • TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Only skimmed the article: why did their initial theme color solution affect the media contents like international orange? Feels like that would be a non-starter…