• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are you fucking kidding? So special attorneys, which have been used by pretty much every administration and every congress since the position was created, are not valid now?

    I’m not a law expert, but was the way she dismissed it make it so he can’t be charged again in either another jurisdiction or by the appropriate (in her mind) prosecution team?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      So special attorneys, which have been used by pretty much every administration and every congress since the position was created, are not valid now?

      Yep. Good luck to the Trump administration trying to enforce anything between this an Chevron.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yep. Good luck to the Trump administration trying to enforce anything between this an Chevron.

        That presumes the law means anything to them.

        As this ruling shows, law means nothing to the Republican party.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I am trying to keep “hopeful” that they’ll stick to their Project 2025 plans in the sense that they’ll try to do it through legal shenanigans and loopholes rather than just sending out the Gestapo and keeping everyone in their homes with machine guns.

    • homura1650@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also not an expert, but I don’t think so.

      The big threat of that would be a dismissal after a jury was sworn. At that point, jeopardy attached, so rebringing the case could be unconditional under the double jeopardy clause [0].

      The virtually unappealable way to do this would be to wait until the prosecution finishes their case. At that point, the defense will file a routine motion for a directed verdict that judges routinely deny. The defense gets to do that again after presenting their case. In either case, the judge granting the motion is not apealable.

      The judge could wait until after a verdict and issue a judgement not withstanding verdict, but that is appealable.

      [0] Not always though. A mistrial from a hung Jury can always be retired. Other forms of mistrial may be retryable depending on the facts.

    • ralphio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      was the way she dismissed it make it so he can’t be charged again in either another jurisdiction or by the appropriate (in her mind) prosecution team?

      I don’t think so, it would have said dismissed with prejudice if so.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yup, Trump is getting free from his worst case on a novel technicality.

      BuT tHe lAw pRoTecTs Us aLL eQuaLlY111