jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Lawgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down113
arrow-up1111arrow-down1external-linkAI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Lawgizmodo.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareSgagvefey@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37arrow-down10·1 year ago Though it sounds extreme, there are a lot of smart people in the AI community who truly believe AI could end humanity. No. There are not. Believing anything resembling current tools has the capacity to end humanity in incontrovertible proof that you are not smart.
minus-squareafraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIf we get killed by auto complete we deserve to die.
minus-squareDudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoAI takes a crazy amount of power, which is largely fueled by the same fossil fuels that are indeed killing us off and destroying our habitat, which will kill even more of us, so AI could definitely indirectly kill off humanity.
No. There are not.
Believing anything resembling current tools has the capacity to end humanity in incontrovertible proof that you are not smart.
If we get killed by auto complete we deserve to die.
AI takes a crazy amount of power, which is largely fueled by the same fossil fuels that are indeed killing us off and destroying our habitat, which will kill even more of us, so AI could definitely indirectly kill off humanity.