• thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s right. We theorized the effects shortly after the first coal power plant, and we have observed the effects for a century now. Yet the response has been minimal, to say the least

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      large efforts are being made, its just not up to par with what people are expecting from their governments

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Fostering societal systems of greed and competition rather than of cooperation and compassion.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The problem with cooperation and compassion is that it literally takes one dick to ruin it. If we could incentivize the psychopaths in society to collaborate for their own good, then at least we’d strike a nice balance, but our economies aren’t structured that way.

      A system that can be so easily destabilized is not a system that has planned for the long term. I think we’re slowly getting there, as even the dicks in society are beginning to realise that they can be shunned for their public actions, and that shunning does come with real financial consequences.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I just can’t subscribe to that idea. If it took 1 dick to ruin everything society would never have gotten off the ground in the first place. Hell, even today, our power grid pretty much operates off the principle of 'don’t be a dick and shoot this with the guns we all have" and it took MAGA craziness for people to attack them. I’d say compassion operates within any given system in spite of people being dicks and thats why we have prevailed the way we have.

    • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This, we moved from Tribes to towns to cities to be more efficient but lost the cooperative aspect of the tribe which made it more efficient in the first place. Now corporations do market research until they figure out exactly what we can afford to get our needs met and then charge that price instead of anything related to their actual costs. It’s resulted in a situation to where most people live month to month and can’t afford vacation or even an unexpected car repair.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thats me. My car, teeth, hair, and some parts of my rental house (thanks landlord) are falling apart and I can’t afford to fix any of it cause rent and bills are due each month and they keep going up. Its fucken madness, its making me insane.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Every time someone tried to make “a weapon so powerful it would make people not want to wage war”.

    Several weapons are on this list, from the cannon to the machine gun to, most famously, the atomic bomb.

    The fact that this happened once would’ve been understandable. The fact this escalated to nuclear weapons because people just tried pushing this idea is nuts though.

    This is not toward so much the technology, with all tech being no less inevitable, but more to do with the intentions/hindsight/foresight of the people making something that can only be produced by an assembly in a seemingly dire setting, as opposed to something like AI, which does not stem from that and which would’ve come around at some time.

    By extension, this extends to populism in general, a mindset that from experience I refuse to compliment. I’m surrounded by people every day who come off as thinking with their feet and not with the methodological part of them, and my experiences with this have never allowed me to be fully at peace.

  • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    Opting for gasoline over electricity early on when cars started to become a thing, we were already going electric, but a smear campaign put fear into people’s minds about electric and switched tk gasoline.

    • arxdat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      We always have to pander to the capitalists profits, how could the make money with clean electricity???

  • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Investing everything in engines and abandoning battery development in the early 1900s. Lead-acid batteries were heavy but usable, and electric cars were more popular until electric starters were added to engines. A disproportionately big, short-lived reason was the lack of sufficient electrical grid for electric cars trying to go far.

    Nobody in government was thinking ahead, so everyone was forced to trying to make their own money NOW, and that’s how we get inhumane tech in general. Same thing happening in computers for decades now. We need centralised R&D free from market influence for the benefit of all life.

  • SORROW@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Many of us will be miserable for the rest of our lives and society won’t care.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    The election of Richard Nixon. I sincerely believe that’s where we traded the “flying cars robot butlers” timeline for the “worst inequality of literally ever” timeline.