I personally like to reserve “parasite” for the investors, the ones who will literally send you to court if you try to be human to your employees.
It’s the same picture
No you are Spiderman dot jpg
deleted by creator
Parasite species at least actually require resources from their host to survive. I think it might be too generous of a label
Hoarders don’t take things from others (not explicitly). So this term is too kind, and inaccurate.
They are stealing from us, folks. They’re fucking criminals.
I like “Robber Barrons”. I just wish it didn’t sound so cool.
Following the people from another comment thread - oligarchs. It might sound post-Soviet and old-fashioned to some, but it is a rather apt description - the power of few, if you translate literally
Another facet (at least specifically in America) is to de-stigmatize discussing personal income among the working class. We’ve been melt-brained hard to think it’s as private and taboo as discussing one’s most deep and darkest sexual kinks when really it’s just a tool of the owners to keep workers indentured in the wage-slave economy.
I’m doing my part! I’ve been bringing it up at lunch.
Or just oligarch or power addict. In the eyes of most people, wealth is about luxury, material goods and fancy toys. Of course that’s part of it, but at a certain point, wealth is no longer about luxury and toys, it’s about power and having control over resources everyone else depends on.
‘Money pervert’ also works
Wealth predator. It has more of that negative connotation it deserves
I’ve become personally partial to “landleech”.
or oligarch, wait nvm how could i forget only the other has those, silly me how could i forget.
“Wage slave master”?
It is long past time we got over our child-like worship of billionaires.
Indeed, there’s nothing inherently exceptional in
billionaireswealth hoarders, according to many studies of this phenomenon. They are literally just lucky enough that they managed to get their hands on such a ludicrous amount of money, they really aren’t anything special.
“dragon”
I’m old school, I stick to calling them boss, capitalist, and bourgeoisie
Sometimes I use the term “psychopathic hoarder class” when referring to this group of people.
I think it isn’t going to be that effective a phrase. People don’t understand why having lots of money (hoarding wealth) is a bad thing, necessarily, and it sort of implies that, if they were to just spend it it’d make the initial hoarding fine.
Gotta also focus on the fact that they essentially stole that money from workers through labor exploitation. The bare fact that they got the money to begin with is the problem, not just them holding onto it. If they were to spend it all on horrible capitalist enterprises rather than hoarding it, that’d be even worse. Even if they spent it all on “philanthropic” efforts, that’s still worse than the workers having their fair share and the government being able to actually have that money to spend on social programs through taxes.
Corporation controller also seems apt, since that’s what their wealth usually is.
Fecal dragon?
