The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    6 months ago

    If copyright is sacrosanct then the creation of data by me is my own personal property and without a contract anyone holding my data is in violation.

    • crank0271@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      Afraid to upvote this in case someone later attempts to prove I viewed this data with my eyes

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Every single person in the EU needs to sue on these grounds.

      Also fuck this corporatist statist bullshit. Why the fuck do people keep voting in authoritarians?

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I can relate to the sentiment, but that just makes it worse. How do you enforce ownership of data?

      There’s only 1 thing for it: More internet surveillance.