Key points:

  • Cara’s Rapid Growth: The app gained 600,000 users in a week

  • Artists Leaving Instagram: The controversy around Instagram using images to train AI led many artists to seek an alternative

  • Cara’s Features: The app is designed specifically for artists and offers a ‘Portfolio’ feature. Users can tag fields, mediums, project types, categories, and software used to create their work

  • While Cara has grown quickly, it is still tiny compared to Instagram’s massive user base of two billion.

  • Glaze Integration: Cara is working on integrating Glaze directly in the app to provide users with an easy way to protect their work from be used by any AI

more about: https://blog.cara.app/blog/cara-glaze-about

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Join Pixelfed instead!

    Cara is just another fucking centralized social media that’s gonna get run to the ground the moment they can monetize their user base.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Cara is popular because of it’s anti ai stance. They have a detector to not allow ai images to be on the platform. Pixelfed allows it and also lack active users that are not artists.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        For now.

        Ai support or not it will still be aggressively monetized the moment enough users are locked in.

        Fomo is a hell of a drug eh.

    • AGreenPurple@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The main problem with all the alternatives is for me (as a hobby photographer) the lack of models on these platforms. When looking for models, I find them on Instagram and no other platform. As with WhatsApp the majority of “normal” people have decided to use that, so if I’m telling them to contact me on Signal, they shy away from that (and stillI I refuse to use it as much as possible).

      So looking at Signal, it’s free and very, very close to WhatsApp and yet still people don’t want to use that. Getting them to use pixel fed would be much, much harder.

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yet another centralised social network. That pinky-promises they’ll never go bad.

    Join now! Bring your friends! No ads! Everything’s free! We’re indie!..

    Moments later… enshitification ensues.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Does it seem odd… This is a crowd that is all about “hands off muh property”. And yet they see nothing suspicious about someone giving them a free service.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yep, this is just instagram again with a little anti ai image filter on top. And a portfolio, not a photo album !

      If it’s not as interoperable as email, it belongs in the trash

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 months ago

    According to their terms and service, everything uploaded to their website is then owned by them. Doesn’t seem very artist friendly to me.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why did you specifically not put in bold this part and are the property of Cara. Clearly you saw it off you took the time to avoid putting stars around it.

    • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They actually seem quite a bit different. The one for Cara isn’t perfectly round and seems to suggest a person in the middle.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, they’re different, but “white circular C on a black background” just made me think of the CN one.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        Re: the hosting company

        Your account does not appear to have spend management enabled, which would allow you to pause your project entirely if you hit a certain level of spend.

        So, this is something of a devil’s bargain. Either shut down your website just as it’s catching fire and gaining traction. Or get billed a year’s server budget in a matter of days because of exploding costs.

        In a saner world, this might be used as an argument for treating the Internet as a public utility and not a for-profit rent. Perhaps more companies could grow and sustain large pools of customers if they weren’t kneecapped by their own momentum.

        Instead, I’m sure we’re going to see more exotic insurance and finance services designed to siphon money out of websites as a hedge against unexpected growth.

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Do you mind telling what this says ? it seems Firefox doesn’t load twitter anymore. Or maybe you need an account ? I’m not sure, but it says “error”

        • Dicska@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          “Jingna Zhang @ cara.app/zemotion @zemotion So freaking speechless right now. Seen many @vercel functions stories but first time experiencing such discrepancy vs request logs like, this is cannot be real??”

          • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’ve heard from many ppl that vercel is pretty nasty that way, and to only use them for learning and toy projects.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pixelfed looks like they are doing a huge push to get up to speed. It has been an immature app/platform for a long time and slow to get the features that people need from a photo sharing social media.

    According to their mastodon, they are working for better AI management features, and launching an app that will make it a genuinely positive experience.

    • ams@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I really want Pixelfed to take off and this really could have been a moment, but after using it for more than a year now, I just can’t see it. Development is very slow - it feels like a one-man show (it might not be). We do need an alternative to Instagram, but yeah…

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ll be watching this curiously from a safe distance for now. I am interested in a new platform without AI, but this stinks of early-stage enshitification.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    …until they decide to sell their company. Or their user data. Or the shareholders say so. Or…

  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t understand how this Glaze thing is supposed to stop AI being trained on the art.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not. It’s supposed to target certain open source AIs (Stable Diffusion specifically).

      Latent diffusion models work on compressed images. That takes less resources. The compression is handled by a type of AI called VAE. For this attack to work, you must have access to the specific VAE that you are targeting.

      The image is subtly altered so that the compressed image looks completely different from the original. You can only do that if you know what the compression AI does. Stable Diffusion is a necessary part of the Glaze software. It is ineffective against any closed source image generators that have trained their own VAE (or equivalent).

      This kind of attack is notoriously fickle and thwarted by even small changes. It’s probably not even very effective against the intended target.

      If you’re all about intellectual property, it kinda makes sense that freely shared AI is your main enemy.

      • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not only is this kind of attack notoriously unstable, finding out what images have been glazed is a fantastic indicator for finding high-quality art that is the stuff you want to train on.

        • General_Effort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I doubt that. Having a very proprietary attitude towards one’s images and making good images are not related at all.

          Besides, good training data is to a large extent about the labels.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It pollutes the data pool. The rule of gigo (garbage in garbage out) is used to garbage the AI results.

      Basically, it puts some imperceptible stuff in the image file’s data (somebody else should explain how because I don’t know) so that what the AI sees and the human looking at the picture sees are rather different. So you try and train it to draw a photorealistic car and instead it creates a lumpy weird face or something. Then the AI uses that defective nonsense to learn what “photorealistic car” means and reproduce it - badly.

      If you feed a bunch of this trash into an AI and tell it that this is how to paint like, say, Rembrandt, and then somebody uses it to try to paint a picture like Rembrandt, they’ll end up getting something that looks like it was scrawled by a 10-year-old, or the dogs playing poker went through a teleporter malfunction, or whatever nonsense data was fed into the AI instead.

      If you tell an AI that 2+2=🥔, that pi=9, or that the speed of light is Kevin, then nobody can use that AI to do math.

      If you trained Chat GPT to explain history by feeding it descriptions of games of Civ6 them nobody could use it to cheat on their history term paper. The AI would go on about how Gandhi attacked Mansa Musa in 1686 with all out nuclear war. It’s the same thing here, but with pictures.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right but, AFAIK glaze is targeting the CLIP model inside diffusion models, which means any new versions of CLIP would remove the effect of the protection