• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The article suggests that the issues occur most in private detention centers, and argues that ill detainees should be relocated to healthcare facilities. Private detention centers most certainly should be abolished, and not just for ICE detainees.

    The article also states they have been 10 deaths in FY 2024 according to ICE.gov, however the website only shows 6. I’m guessing the website is not updated, but the article only identifies two deaths since January, making the total 8. I haven’t found information on the other two deaths reported elsewhere.

    Here are the number of deaths by fiscal year from ICE.gov:

    FY 2024 - 6 (10 reported by NBC)

    FY 2023 - 4

    FY 2022 - 3

    FY 2021 - 5

    FY 2020 - 21

    FY 2019 - 8

    FY 2018 - 6

    www.ice.gov/detain/detainee-death-reporting

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you for posting the actual numbers. This article is pretty shitty imo. I read it just to see if they even included them (I guess, to their credit, at least they did that).

      4,3,5 and 10(even though the govt is reporting 6) over the last 4 years.

      So even assuming 10 is correct, using the “more than doubled” almost seems like journalistic malpractice. At best it’s click-bait garbage. Where was the “ICE sees 25% drop in in-custody deaths” article a few years ago?

      Should we watch it to see if it’s a broader trend? Yea, probably. Is this necessarily indicative of anything nefarious? No.

      There could be (and likely are) legitimate reasons for the increase that have nothing to do with “ICE bad”. Like maybe, people coming in already sick, maybe an older demographic, unvaccinated people, etc etc. or literally just random fucking chance.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why are we keeping them in such poor conditions if they’re already sick? Why aren’t they in hospitals?

        • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          “in custody deaths” means deaths while under the supervision of ICE. That could be detained at an ICE facility or in a hospital “while being detained”.

          If you got arrested by your local police for something and were in jail, but got sick so they send you to the hospital (with a cop escort usually)…then you died there. That counts as “in custody”.

          So don’t conflate in-custody with “not being sent to hospitals”.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Oh I’m not conflating anything. Between the immigration advocates and the government agency caught committing human rights abuses I’m going to believe the immigration advocates. They don’t send them to hospitals.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The article states there are on-site medical practitioners and facilities. I think they’re suggesting there’s no practice in place if a detainee needs advanced medical care.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              “Comprehensive medical care is provided from the moment individuals arrive and throughout the entirety of their stay,” the agency said in the statement, as well as in previous statements following detainee deaths. “All people in ICE custody receive medical, dental and mental health intake screening within 12 hours of arriving at each detention facility, a full health assessment within 14 days of entering ICE custody or arrival at a facility, and access to medical appointments and 24-hour emergency care. At no time during detention is a detained noncitizen denied emergent care.”

              Again, it’s about them not having access to advanced medical care. If a detainee needs an MRI, CT, colonoscopy, etc. there is no practice in place for relocation to a medical facility.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                And I’m saying the guys known for spraying detainees with so much pesticide they were bleeding from their orifices aren’t going to tell you they don’t give anyone any actual medical care. They have an army medic that gets 5 minutes to look at them through the bars. And that’s only when they get one assigned to them.

    • pewter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The numbers are interesting and I bet the 2020 number is very high because of covid, but them comparing total deaths might be statistical deception.

      How old were the people who died? What were the causes of death? Did the total amount of people in detention stay consistent over time?

      According to the article, a few of the ones listed are pretty young, but they didn’t show causes of death.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes but also ICE decided to go half way to the Nazi solution and sprayed detainees with pesticide so much they caused health problems. (The holocaust gas chamber were a very high dose of pesticide.)

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It was probably mostly covid with some Title 42 mixed in, considering the previous numbers were on the higher side as well.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Crazy thought, but maybe it’s not the President in charge. Maybe it’s the record high heat and the deplorable conditions of confinement.

      Maybe we shouldn’t be holding these people in concentration camps to begin with.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe the president should have tackled the bad conditions in ICE detainment like he promised? He promised a more fair and humane system after Trump’s abuses of detainees and instead he’s treated Trump’s conditions as a record to beat.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Maybe the president should have tackled the bad conditions in ICE detainment like he promised?

          Sounds like pie-in-the-sky leftist agitprop to me.

          He promised a more fair and humane system after Trump’s abuses of detainees and instead he’s treated Trump’s conditions as a record to beat.

          Everyone knows that a Democratic President doesn’t have the same authority as a Republican President.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            So fun fact. On my phone I have you tagged as sarcastic. But on my computer I haven’t figured out how to tag people yet.

            But yes.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        ICE is controlled by the department of Homeland Security, which is under the executive branch. As we remember from civics class, the president is directly responsible for the executive branch. The president is responsible for the atrocities at the border.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, sorry, four years of Trump vs. four years of Biden should really have put to rest the idea that both parties are the same, even if they sometimes support the same bad policies.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            An election nearly four years ago? What a strange question.

            Now, please explain to me how Judge Jackson would be the same sort of justice Trump would have nominated to SCOTUS.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          four years of Trump vs. four years of Biden should really have put to rest the idea that both parties are the same

          Biden isn’t on Twitter, so we can ignore the wars and the concentration camps and the Cop Cities and the deteriorating climate.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Since I didn’t get a response from the other person, perhaps you could explain why Judge Jackson is the sort of SCOTUS justice Trump would have picked.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              That’s pretty strawman of you. Assuming he’s operating in bad faith; how does appointing Judge Jackson stop the ratchet effect? That’s what we’re talking about here. I happen to think he’s operating in good faith, just to his donors instead of his constituency. But the effect is the same, holding the status quo that the GOP sets. Why hasn’t Mayorkas purged ICE in an attempt to reform it? Where are the wide ranging investigations of the human rights abuses that were so well reported during the Trump administration? Biden’s goal was never to bring things back in line, it was to keep the lights on and keep the money flowing to the donors. Some of whom run private detention centers.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                No, we were talking about how the two parties are exactly the same. If they are exactly the same, Trump would have the same reason for picking justice Jackson as Biden. So what is that reason?

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I understand that’s your straw man. But that’s not what the other people in this thread are saying.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                What does any of that have to do with Judge Jackson? Just explain why Judge Jackson is the sort of SCOTUS justice Trump would have picked since both parties are the same.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  What does any of that have to do with Judge Jackson?

                  We would have more Judge Jacksons on the court if the Dem Senate had played hardball with Republican Presidents. And taking Thomas out of circulation in 1991 would have changed the Bush v Gore decision in 2000, which would have meant President Al Gore seating even more Judge Jacksons in his subsequent terms.

                  No Thomas means no Bush Jr. No Bush Jr means no gerrymandering greenlit by Ashcroft’s DOJ. Which would have promised more state level liberal courts in places like Texas and Wisconsin (ie, more state court Judge Jacksons). Which would have curbed the rise of white nationalism following Obama’s election in 2008. No GOP capture of Florida through mass disenfranchisement of black voters. No extended legacy of GOP rule in Georgia, for the same reasons. No War on Immigration in Arizona and Colorado and Texas, forcing those states farther and farther to the right. All of which would have precluded a Trump presidency in 2016.

                  No Trump means we don’t have to worry about who he’d pick for SCOTUS.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    5, 3, 4,then 10 deaths in the past four years including 2024, all inmates were given medical and dental, psychological support and there are two causes of death of in the article unknown, which is probably the most cause for concern.

    I looked it up.

    The two unknown are undergoing investigations now, standard practice in ICE to investigate cause of death

    8 of the deaths since 2018 resulted from covid in at-risk populations, 9 from suicide, which I think is a little higher than the american average of 14 per 100,000 people, but some of these people left notes saying that if they might be sent back then they’re going to kill themselves, so… More high stakes, more pressure in a lot of these situations obviously.

    Most of the covid deaths were in high risk patients, the elderly or chronically ill with kidney issues or the like.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      So basically, you just did more legwork than the journalist that published this article and there isn’t a big story here. Maybe if those 2 deaths come back “omg aliens killed them” we’d have a story.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean, what this actually says is there’s been a year within the last five that was worse. Obviously nobody should be dying and frankly ICE should not exist and murica just needs to stop pretending it’s so special since it’s such shit to begin with, but “within the range of the last five years” is just a boring angle to write an article from.

  • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Of course it is. Democrats either do the right thing and appear soft on immigrants right before election l, or they do the wrong thing and these sick fucks get to have fun continuing to torture and kill people. It’s really. A win-win for them.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hmm…I don’t want to read the article, but I’m pretty sure it’s not Internal Combustion Engine…

    From context, it seems like it must be… Immigrant Containment Encampments?