OpenAI could be fined up to $150,000 for each piece of infringing content.
  • Swervish@lemmy.mlEnglish
    568·
    1 year ago

    Not trying to argue or troll, but I really don’t get this take, maybe I’m just naive though.

    Like yea, fuck Big Data, but…

    Humans do this naturally, we consume data, we copy data, sometimes for profit. When a program does it, people freak out?

    edit well fuck me for taking 10 minutes to write my comment, seems this was already said and covered as I was typing mine lol

    • QHC@lemmy.worldEnglish
      219·
      1 year ago

      It’s just a natural extension of the concept that entities have some kind of ownership of their creation and thus some say over how it’s used. We already do this for humans and human-based organizations, so why would a program not need to follow the same rules?

      • Hello Hotel@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        I like that argument as it applies to our ai, which isnt ment to reject bad ideas or motiefs but to never have a bad idea in the first place. This setup results in the bot’s path of least resistance being to copy someones homework. Nobody wants the bot to do that.

        Someday we may have AI that argument is harder to apply to

        i attempt explain, irrelivant

        text generators have a “most correct” output that looks and behaves simmlar to pressing the first of the keyboard suggested words repeatedly. We add noise, where the bot is on a dice roll forced to add a random letter to it’s output. Like the above example if you typed a 5 letter word every so often instead.