I hate that everything now is a subscription service instead of buying it and do whatever you want.

  • BoofStroke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Other than the recent nonsense, this is why I cancelled Netflix and went back to pirating. Content leaves unexpectedly? Not on my Nas.

    • peanut_boy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Content leaving isn’t a problem. If they give up some things they have more money to get the rights to other content, and usually by the time it leaves I’ve either watched it or don’t want to. If it’s one of the rare things I want to watch several times, I can just buy it. But cracking down on password sharing is ridiculous. They’ve been functioning fine with people sharing passwords. I bet the current pricing accounts for password sharing. But now people in college can’t be on the family netflix? Pure greed.

      • Snowcano@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Content leaving is totally a problem. I’ve lost track of the number of times my spouse and I say, “Oh hey, what about we finally watch xyz that’s been in our queue for ages? Yeah that seems like a good one for Friday pizza night! …oh, it’s vanished from our queue, hooray.”

        It’s not my full time job to keep tabs on what’s coming and going from the damn entertainment service that I hope to use in my ever dwindling reserves of free time. Especially when there’s alternative means available that are not too difficult to use.

      • Yendor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t actually need to be aware of it. Because you said you were aware of it, when you clicked Accept on the EULA, and on page 62 of the EULA it said they have the right to disable your printer remotely at any time and for any reason.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In decent nations, an EULA is considered an attempt by the seller to, after the purchase, change the terms of the implicit contract which was the sale, so it’s has no legal standing whatsoever.

          Absolutelly, the seller can set contract terms before the sale is done (and even then there are lots of limitations to avoid things like bait & switch, so it usualy has to be pretty clear and upfront and there are certain rights that a retail buyer simply cannot loose, even contractually), but never after the sale has been done.

          EULAs only have legal standing in a few places, including a few States in the US.

        • monobot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          When ever I am forced to sign something (like some contract addendum for my job) I write that I don’t understand anything on that paper, or now I write it in email before e-signing.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It should be. But you agreed to it. Gotta print out that child support declaration in 20 minutes before your lawyer has to go to court? Hey fuck you consumer. Have a medical emergency and need to print something to save a patient? Fuck you consumer.

      Someone should sue them for everything they are. Because they are thieves of the highest order.

      • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But you agreed to it.

        When does an agreement become null and void when the knowledge and time needed to understand the terms, and especially whether they even stand in the various jurisdictions, is simply unfeasible for a layperson to be expected to possess?

        In a similar vein, if an agreement requires a lawyer on call/retainer to interpret, what court besides a bought court would possibly uphold such a standard?

        Fwiw I’m not asking this with the expectation of you personally having the answers, but to further highlight the absurdity of many of these so-called agreements.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just read an article the other day that said LG is about to start charging subscription fees for washing machines 🙄

    I will go old school and start washing my clothes against a rock in the river before I’ll pay a fucking subscription to use my own washing machine

    • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That is crazy.

      Like a damn laundromat. So is LG gonna supply water and power too? Wtf are the charging for? The right to buy their product? Lmao. Fuck off.

      Go analog. Real analog. Sticks and stones baby.

      • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article said the subscription was for “software updates” which really seems like something they should provide for free anyway so you’re really just paying for the privilege to use their precious machine that you already paid for lol

          • Clocksstriking13@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s for “smart” washing machines that you can control from your phone etc. So that’s likely what the “updates” would be related too…why you’d need to control your washing machine from afar is beyond me but some people love smart gadgets and will by anything that connects to their phone.

            • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are cases for it, eg programming a wash to occur when energy demand is low.

              In my opinion we should be pursuing technologies to do this that don’t require an internet connection. Even being able to program a schedule into the machine and it can detect if something is in there or not. That would be enough since energy usage follows a relatively consistent plot. These companies don’t give a shit about anything other than coming up with ways to make more money.

              • Gork@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The cost of the laundry subscription is likely to vastly out cost the energy savings it may provide.

  • panCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism leads to innovation they say! This is an innovation in a way some may say !

  • nl4real@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My mom’s Amazon Halo that counts steps just shut off because they ended the service. I do not trust anything that requires live service at this point.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love the fact that brother basically does no marketing as far as I know. They just end up shining like a diamond because they make a generally good product and everyone else around them makes absolute trash.

  • Apeeksiht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    buy laser printers. ink is pretty cheap and as we refill cartridge. i have a hp and and never suffer these subscription shit.

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck is wrong with people? It’s been common knowledge that hp is trash for decades now. The whole idea of capitalism is that the bad products fail when customers go to the competitors who do a better job, but hp is not a monopoly and there are better competitors that exist, but people keep in buying HP because frankly, they are too fucking stupid. Capitalism is a lie because consumers are too stupid to pick the best products.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you only print something once every couple of months I only need a cheap printer and dont care if the ink is a bit more expensice since I never use it. Though I admit my blood pressure always rises trying to get the thing to work

      • Bwaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ink jets burn ink even if you dont print anything, with their periodic “cleaning cycles”. That or their nozzles jam if you dont print often enough. They can make really high quality prints, but I’d never buy one again. Lasers can sit for months and they still pop out perfect prints every time.

  • regex1883@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ++ for brother. Still running my mfc j470 ink jet purchased in 2013. I purchased it because of their support of Linux and Android. I’ve NEVER used official ink cartridges besides what came with it. it’s printed 6900 pages

  • Laice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Printer company are one of the biggest legalized scammer we currently have. Out water and some ink they make huge amount of Profit.

    They are the Definition of making Gold out of shit.

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    nobody should support companies that place restrictions on their hardware for RANSOM