-modified the original reddit link to point to a privacy frontend-

Now that the change is in place, there is no more login on old. reddit. com

Reddit is getting worse

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s understandably like this, though. The way to quickly iterate on features that we do with modern agile development is much harder to do if you start off with a payment model right off the bat. You won’t retain as many users because they are paying for something unknown just like the Early Access shit we have in the games industry. And investors are easier to get if you already have many users.

    But indeed, once you get investors, that’s when the enshittification starts, I believe. And once you go public as a company, then it’s nothing but free-fall into an endless shit pit.

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I disagree, this has nothing to do with software development models, It’s all about purpose. If your website must start making money quickly, then you can be sure it will have a payment model regardless of how things are developed. Social media business (and others) translated user growth into investment models: you give us this much money at this “completely made up valuation” and we’ll use it to grow our user-base by this much.

      This was possible because interest rates have been very low for the most of the 2010s. This meant that investors would be losing money if they held on to it so they just threw it at “the new tech” hoping something would stick. In the past few years, inflation has driven the interest rates very high and it means that money is not cheap anymore so all these businesses now have to transition to a money making model. That’s all.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Right, but the reason why you employ an agile software development model in the first place is because you want to make money fast. The slow waterfall development models don’t really lend themselves to fast bucks, do they.

        • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The project management approach does not dictate the feature priority. The business dictates the priority. Project management is just a tool

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The project management approach does not dictate the feature priority.

            No, but it does affect development speed.

            • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              what relevance would that have over the time span discussed here?

              And no, whatever you read about agile, the development speed comes down to people not to procedure. That’s true even if we disregard the fact that very few companies claiming to use agile actually understand what agile is

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Well you seem very sure of yourself so everything you say must be correct. Whatever I read is false, whatever I’ve experienced myself is false, gonna take this dude’s word for it. ✔️

                Agile is of course a tool, and you use it to achieve your goals. And of course it comes down to the people using it. Just like a hammer is useless to a centipede. I’m just saying, I’m comparing agile to waterfall as the only changing variable factor.

                Like how deep can you nitpick this.

                • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  you’re attributing a state of fact to a cause that has nothing to do with it. I’m not nitpicking, i’m pointing out a fallacy: the effect doesn’t prove the cause, it only works the other way around

                  • Victor@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I’m not attributing it as a sole factor, like I said. Not a sole factor. Not a sole factor. I hope it sinks in now. Not a sole factor.