• Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    While everyone here is screeching about jerbs, I would like to point out that using AI voices to voice an AI is an artistic genius in itself.

    • Stamau123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah it’s real luddite hours here

      “How will voicebot 2.0 pay for his child’s oil now?”

      • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Are you an idiot?

        People are worried about the actual voice actors who voice act the characters.

        Do you think GLaDOS was voiced by a potato battery?

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I get that record sessions are a huge hassle and simply paying VAs per AI-generated voice line is easier for everyone, but it somehow makes Paradox look a little careless to me.

    Stories like these also set a precident. This is what voice ‘acting’ will be like for a moment before it becomes effectively eliminated because voice libraries will become diverse enough quickly and there will be no need for a single more voice actor to be included. It seems like VAs are basically forced to sell their voice to AI companies quickly to at least make a quick buck before they never get a job again.

    There’s probably no stopping it, but that made this read all the more frustrating to me.

  • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I love how upset people get about things like this

    Your coffee is made by enslaved children and people shrug

    Your clothes were made in a sweatshop and people shrug

    Your music is owned by corporate monsters who impose absurd copyright to steal culture from those that live in it and people shrug

    A theoretical voice actor misses out on a small role and you go wild calling for boycotts and making unhinged tweets at the company?

    Very weird priorities.

    Almost like it’s totally unserious and nothing but self Important performative nonsense.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It was crazy how swiftly media moved to present tons of reasons to hate AI.

      It really made me realize how the people with this strongest opinions have been given those opinions by media that they don’t even realize is a form of media.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The technology was created to replace voice actors. That’s the actual purpose. Its very existence hurts their profession and benefits studios. You can not be a studio, use this technology, and claim to care about ethics, anymore than Amazon can claim to care about the workers as it invests in the machines to replace them.

    No one is holding a gun to their head forcing them to us AI. They made a choice. There is no “ethical” way to cripple the livelihood of working class people for the benefit of your business. Just stop using the word.

    It doesn’t matter if you compensate or get their approval, because the fact is the existence of the technology in the industry effectively compels all voice actors to agree to let it use their voice, or they can’t get work. It becomes a false choice.

    If there was no financial benefit, if it truly made no difference in how much a studio pays in labor or the amount the artists make, there would be no reason for studios to want to use it.

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Technology making labour obsolete is the goal we should all be wanting.

      Attack capitalism not the technology.

        • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s kind of the point though isn’t it? It’s not the car’s fault we can’t afford the gas. We need to stop arguing about the ethics of using AI and start arguing about the ethics of the people using it unethically.

          There is a person in that studio that suggested using AI, there is a person who gave the go ahead to do it. Those people need to be the problem, not the toy they decided to play with.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That said, this choice wasn’t actually a problem right?

            I mean this game doesn’t use voice actors normally. If they used ai voice actors for this update only to represent the ai characters… isn’t that just appropriate?

            Previously all characters in this game were represented only by text, so literally nobody is being replaced here.

            Another way to think about it would be via representation. We get worked up when an ethnic character on screen is played by a different ethnicity, an actor in blackface for example. And in that vein using ai for organic characters could be seen as offensive, but using ai for ai characters would not. In contrast could we see using human voices for ai characters to be insensitive? That may sound far fetched, but this is sci-fi, the ai characters in the game are fully sentient and in their fictional universe would have rights, the whole point is to make the player think about what that means.

            Well I guess I have my takeaway, I may consider boycotting any game that uses human actors for ai characters. Just get an ai actor… seriously.

            • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Honestly, I’d argue that that’s exactly what AI should be for. Either being used by that one guy to give voices to his passion project because he can’t afford to hire voice actors, or to add a touch of the uncanny to an AI character.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In practice, capitalism will use technology to subjugate others instead of allowing technology to free us from work.

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, as long as people keep focusing on fighting the technology instead of fighting capitalism, this is true.

          So we can fight the technology and definitely lose, only to see our efforts subverted to further entrench capitalism and subjugate us harder (hint: regulation on this kind of thing disproportionately affects individuals while corporations carve out exceptions for themselves because ‘it helps the economy’)…

          Or we can embrace the technology and try to use it to fight capitalism, at which point there’s at least a chance we might win, since the technology really does have the potential to overcome capitalism if and only if we can spread it far enough and fast enough that it can’t be controlled or contained to serve only the rich and powerful.

    • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you have any source for those claims? There are plenty of better reasons to develop voice synthesis than replacing voice actors.

      • GalacticHero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Voiced characters that use generative AI in real time instead of prerecorded lines and a dialogue tree come to mind as an obvious use. How cool would that be, to be playing an RPG and ask any character any question you want and get an actual verbal answer? No way you can do that with voice actors.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ever seen the game Vaudeville? It’s a fairly basic detective game but all the characters have their own LLM and AI voices. I bought it for the reason you described. I just had to see the technology in action and I can definitely see a future with generative text/voices in games.

          It’s not perfect by any means but I think it’s a very cool approach to a detective game. There have been updates to it since I played that address most of the problems I had with it like characters forgetting past conversations and giving conflicting info.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I had spitballed an idea similar to this a few months back. Build the characters, world, and situations, and give the AI that information. Pick a few specific pieces of info the AI would have to tell you at specific times, basically to act as guide rails. Then, let the AI and the player just… Interact.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s pretty much Vaudeville. The only things you can do is click on locations and talk to people, each of whom has some bit of information you need to figure out.

              It’s basically an experiment to see what works and what doesn’t with the idea. I appreciate that they kept the scope small (no quests, no WASD movement) and have been implementing changes as they discover the shortfalls (like the ones I’ve mentioned). If it ever does get released as a finished game, it’ll be more like a proof of concept for other games to build off of.

        • nogooduser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I find it to be very off putting that Baldur’s Gate 3 doesn’t have voice actors for the main character.

          There are so many different races that would have different voices and different accents that it wouldn’t be financially viable to do that with voice actors either.

          • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            They originally did for the beta (for origin characters at least) but the players didn’t really like it so the feature was removed

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The only real ethical concern is around the training data. If all voices are compensated / actively consent to be used in an AI program, then this is just a tool. People losing jobs doesn’t really matter to an individual company. Industries change and technology advances.

        So the real problem is they are using these types of tools, built of the skill of other voice actors, without properly compensating them or getting their consent.

    • style99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s the point of bringing up “ethics?” The job only existed in the first place because of technology, and now people want to argue that there is a right or wrong aspect to it?

      How about the poor candle makers or buggy whip manufacturers? Should we keep downgrading society just to keep a few “artists” happy?

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The concern is that the training and potentially production voices are not properly compensated or consenting

        It’s not so much that a new tool is used, it’s that it exists due to the artistic product of people who aren’t profiting from the novel use

        A job coming or going isn’t the true issue

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      claim to care about the workers as it invests in the machines to replace them.

      A company that invests in UBI could make that claim!

      Obviously Amazon doesn’t do that now. But I could see it happening when people stop being able to buy their junk

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have an idea for the practice that could help us better explore practical uses. Basically, a company may train an AI off an actor’s voice, but that actor retains full non-transferable ownership/control of any voices generated from that AI.

      So, if a game is premiering a new game mode that needs 15 new lines from a character, but their actor is busy drinking Captain Morgan in their pool, the company can generate those 15 lines from AI, but MUST have a communication with the actor where they approve the lines, and agree on a price for them.

      It would allow for dynamic voice moments in a small capacity, and keep actors in business. It would still need some degree of regulation to ensure no one pushes gross incentives.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Good to see you have formed a strong opinion without having all of the information.

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    we’re pretty good at exploring dystopian sci-fi and don’t want to end up there ourselves

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I always think its the other way around. Some author writes a scary possibility about some topic that scared them but they don’t know a lot about. So like a book about a massive bedron impactor creates mini black holes that eats everything it touches. Book becomes popular and in ten years the LHC has some breakthrough but the zeitgeist was already established and people find all the reasons the cool ass tech is really going to be he worst thing ever.

  • loo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Still waiting for them to fix their game and not produce even more DLCs

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        From my experience, nothing. I’m not sure what the guy is complaining about.

      • loo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago
        • They changed the keybindings without giving you the ability to edit keybindings yourself
        • The performance is bad
        • The game speed is linked to framerate and the longer your run is, the slower your game runs
        • The former point results in players in multiplayer getting kicked because of synchronization issues
        • Many minor bugs such as science ships getting trapped at one planet because they cant ever finish surveying them
        • DLCs being absolutely overpriced sometimes
        • Mechanics being absolutely unbalanced

        I bought the game on release and played the game for over 700 hours since and I had to witness many patches that introduced so many bugs

        • Zekas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Performance is tied to pops. Easy to get around by using a smaller galaxy, still bad yes but solvable.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Have any of the involved voice actors confirmed the claims made in the article? I’ve seen multiple articles on this game, and the only quotes are from the game’s director.

    So far I’ve only seen one side claim this is ethical. That’s not enough.