• US home prices have soared 47% so far this decade.
  • The price surge has outpaced the gains seen in the 1990s and 2010s, and is nearly ahead of the 2000s.
  • The rising value of homes has coincided with a millennial-fueled demand surge and years of low mortgage rates.

US home prices have soared 47.1% so far this decade, according to a ResiClub analysis of the Case-Shiller National Home Price Index.

The massive price gains seen in the first four years of the 2020s have eclipsed all of the growth seen in the 1990s and 2010s, according to the analysis. Housing prices in those two decades grew 30.1% and 44.7%, respectively.

On top of that, housing price growth in the 2020s is on the verge of eclipsing all of the growth seen in the 2000s, which was 47.3% after peaking at just over 80% before the 2007 housing market crash.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    …an ongoing surge in demand from millennial home buyers has steadily pushed home prices higher

    The thing is, housing is a universal human need, so as the population goes up, the demand for housing will go up as well.

  • Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    My area in particular gets a lot of housing market “investment”.

    The going rate for a one bedroom is $1400 a month or $460,000 for a single family home in the suburbs with no access to public transport.

    It’s rough out here.

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Interesting. In my neighborhood, the houses are selling for $300-400k, but renting for $2-3k per month.

    • iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Those numbers mean nothing without knowing the local wages. In my neighborhood the lowest priced 800 sqft homes are 950k and one bedroom rent is $2400. So your area sounds like a killer deal.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I wasn’t trying to build a statistically significant argument, just giving my anecdotal woes of the local economy.

        However median income for my area is $62,000. Rent range is $1400 - $3000 I gave the low end. Average is about $2,300. Hopefully that gives context.

        • iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, I wasn’t trying to give you a hard time, just sharing how drastically different housing markets can be. I could sell my house in California and buy a 400k house outright from the equity that has accumulated. Alot of middle class Californian are doing just that, selling their houses and buying in the south or midwest with cash. It’s part of what is inflating your housing costs because your market is more affordable than mine. For comparison, the median houshold income in my city is 89k but the median house list price is 1 million, making your market more affordable and attractive for those that need some relief from inflation.

          • Franklin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            A $1 million median is insane, even going by median cost of ownership in my area for a fairly standard single family home is $550,000, you could get away for $450,000 on the low end though.

            I guess it can always get worse. The part that strikes me is that I live in an area that is fairly low density and was previously known for its home affordability. So I would say you’re right, that plus investment firms buying up a lot of the available housing. Not to mention the additional cost that car centric infrastructure lays on the individual.

            I really hope things improve but I won’t hold my breath.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    So is this adjusted for inflation? The word is not mentioned once in the article.

    Using inflation calculators I get the following (used https://www.calculator.net/inflation-calculator.html and https://www.officialdata.org/us/inflation/; getting similar results)

    • 1990s - $124,800 ($298,200 today)
    • 2000s - $165,300 ($299,800 today)
    • 2010s - $219,000 ($313,600 today)
    • 2020s - $327,100 ($394,700 today)
    • Now - $420,800

    Looking at FRED economic data (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS), it looks like thats where they got their figures. As far as I can tell is it not inflation adjusted. They have picked the Q4 results for each year as base for the 1 Jan.

    When adjusted for inflation, the increase in value since the 1990s is much less AND the increase was biggest between 2010-2020.

    Also on their own figures in the article; between 2020 and now the median price is up 28% without inflation adjustment, and 7% with. Compared to 1990 the median price corrected for inflation is up 40%, but the biggest jump is 2010-2020; it began 2020 32% above the 1990 price.

    The point? House prices are up, but inflation has been uneven over that period, with a big spike recently - the dramatic figures in the article may not reflect the real story. According to the calculators from 2020 to 2024 the total inflation rate is 21.54%; equivalent to 4.7% a year. Inflation accounts for much more of the perceived price rise than the actual real value rise.

    The problem with inflation is people only think about today’s inflation rate. Current US inflation is 3.5% but that is on top of last years inflation, and the year before that etc. So dramatic articles like this are really of dubious value.

    EDIT: The article links to “analysis” by another website ResiClib. They do not seem to have looked at inflation at all either.

  • Kyrrrr@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can we just band together as like 30 individuals and do the development ourselves? Like I want to find enough people that together we can afford to construct a set of condos without relying on some giant fucking company to do it.

    I’m not kidding, I want to own a home someday

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I wish it was possible, a citizen’s co-op sounds amazing.

      I will say I’ve seen it tried with varying degrees of success so It’d have to done carefully.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Outlaw Airbnb and similar practices and see how affordable housing suddenly becomes available

  • Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Capitalism never stops. It’s only continually grasping at the money of the average person in an attempt to accrue it all.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m sure it’s not what you mean, but it sounds like you’re suggesting burning houses down, which would make the problem worse

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Bought in '21, so far my home value is unchanged. But I have $40,000 in equity going for me so that’s nice.