• Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Good news I guess as I’ll never again buy a new computer which can’t be upgraded in the long term.

    It ain’t my vision anymore and I hope more and more consumers think about buying second hand or buying upgradeable computers.

    • daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      How about phones? They are a computer after all.

      I’m in the proces of choosing a new one (forced by hardware failures of current one) a I hate having to choose all of its parameters with no possibility of any upgrade or meaningful configuration at the time of purchase.

    • shameless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      I remember learning about this in the early 00’s but then the textbooks were saying about this newer memory technology which the world has moved to known as DDR! Makes me feel so old now 👵

  • rdri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wonder if it means something for handheld devices like Steam Deck.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you’re a manufacture, what incentives LPCAMM2 gives you over soldering the RAM? With soldering, you can upsell the upgrades and force ppl to replace the whole machine every 1-2 years. How does LPCAMM2 benefits the company? I’m talking in general, not some niche manufacturers like Framework.

    TBH, I don’t think many will adopt this. Maybe it will show up in some expensive laptops like high end gaming and workstation, but majority of them wouldn’t.

  • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    81
    ·
    7 months ago

    “we created the problem of soldered-on ram! now we have the solution: a new standard, for no fucking reason!” -every memory, board, and system company

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        7 months ago

        For the curious (and lazy):

        According to repair biz iFixit, the issue with the power-frugal LPDDR memory chips is that the lower voltage they operate at calls for more attention to be paid to signal integrity between the CPU and memory. In practice, this has meant shorter track distances on the circuit board, leading to LPDDR being soldered down as close to the processor as possible.

        LPCAMM2 is intended to address this by putting LPDDR onto a circuit board module that is “cleverly designed to mount right up next to the CPU,” with “very short traces to help maximize signal integrity,” the iFixit team explains in a blog and video detailing their hands-on with the ThinkPad P1 Gen 7.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        “they did it to save power!!! 111 one eleven”

        there was perfectly fine memory that was upgradable before. They (system integrators/oems) saw it as a way to kill the upgrade market, boosting profits.

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          “It’s more performant than the old SODIMM sticks, vastly more efficient, it saves space, and it should even help with thermals as well. All that, and it’s still about as repairable as anything we’ve ever seen,” iFixit concluded.

          Yes, there was a perfectly fine, upgradable memory standard before. And many 486s were also perfectly fine, upgradable computers.

          The fact that a new technology makes it so we can have our cake and eat it too — upgradability without any compromise — is a fantastic innovation.

        • themachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          So you believe that the performance improvement and power saving is not worth creating a new standard?

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, not at the cost of locking in customer choice and flexibility. I have soldered-on ram in my ThinkPad, but not in my Predator gaming laptop. There is a -157% chance that Lenovo was trying to extract a few percent of extra speed so that I can open Firefox 0.13 seconds faster. Perhaps they’d try to cry “but battery life!”, in which case I’d respond with “well it’s not fucking working” as that machine barely gets 2.5h on a brand-new battery, browsing the web + terminal windows doing server admin stuff. (ThinkPad X13 Gen 2, Intel, with WWAN if you’re curious. Fucking 1.5k and it’s just passable for basic usage on the go.)

            I’m not really upset with this ‘new’ standard, but the fact that oems are absolutely going to use it as bullshit marketing “look, we fixed the problem! get our un-fucked ram for only $129 per stick!”. That’s what the fuck I’m pissed off about.

            • themachine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I mean I’m not sitting here defending soldered on ram but your unnecessary aggression and sarcasm in your previous responses overshadows the fact that while solder on ram sucks for the upgrade and repair market the underlying tech has very tangible improvements and now we can maintain that improvement and the upgrade and repair functions.

              I agree, soldered ram is bad. But I disagree that LPDDR ram is fundamentally bad and this improvement allowing it to be modular while maintaining its improvements is a very good thing.

              As far as your complaints of battery life on your thinpad goes, there is much more to battery life than the consumption of the memory but naturally every part plays a role and small improvements in multiple places result in a larger net improvement. I’m assuming you’re running linux which in my experience has always suffered from less than optimal power usage. I’m far from an expert in that particular area but its always been my understanding that it is largely caused by insufficient fireware support.

              As a whole this looking at this article in a vacuum i only see good things. A major flaw with lpddr has been address and i will be able to expect these improvements in future systems.