• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yup. Protests are clearly effective. One thing about the point of violence- if you’re at a protest and you hear threats or see violence, speak up or leave. With the new ruling by SCOTUS, one bad actor can have the entire protest charged with criminal behavior. Stay safe. Protect yourselves and one another.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          True. Although it doesn’t matter if it’s a provocateur or an actual racist, they’ll get you arrested just the same.

          • 800XL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            9 months ago

            Except all the nazi demonstrations get police escorts to/from the site and maybe a slap on the wrist if they hurt or kill someone.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              9 months ago

              Because the police protect their own.

              Its why every time the nazis/fascists/racists march, the cops always have their backs to them watching the crowds… yet when people like the college students march, they stand facing them, salivating for an excuse.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Definitely a victory for the protestors. I’m a bit disappointed that they’re agreeing to hear arguments and vote on the issue in October, rather than committing to anything or taking any action in the next 6 months. Still, props to the school for listening to the students.

  • Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s encouraging. Just when I thought nothing would come of the protests. Now to see if the vote actually pass a motion to divest.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No backbone, they just got caught red-handed and even now are trying to weasel out by setting the voting date 6 months from now. They’re hoping the media attention would have died out by then.

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Does selling their stock really do anything? All the big investment firms will still buy these up for their mutual funds. Unless everyone agrees not to buy their stock, I don’t see how this helps. And even then, their stock would be so cheap they could just buy it back themselves and go private right?

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Does selling their stock really do anything? All the big investment firms will still buy these up for their mutual funds. Unless everyone agrees not to buy their stock, I don’t see how this helps. And even then, their stock would be so cheap they could just buy it back themselves and go private right?

      Its what forced South Africa to break up their apartheid state. Yeah, it really actually works and its one of the only things that has historically been demonstrated to work.

  • betz24@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I thought the whole reason universities had their hands tied were the anti-BDS law. Maybe Brown is in a state (RI) where it won’t lose state funding, but losing federal funding would be a blow to the research orgs.