• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Russian officials publicly assure the world that their invasion will only last 1 week due to their overwhelming military superiority.

    109 weeks later without a victory, losing twice as many soldiers and equipment, Russian officials swear that the US, not an active combatant, is going to be so embarrassed.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was watching an analysis on the 2023 progress of the war. The author said that while he acknowledges that Russia seems to have the favour making the war a stalemate and took more strategic, albeit small, locations than Ukraine did; this leads to Catch-22 for Kremlin that the more Ukraine struggles, the more money Ukraine will receive which is not on Russia’s favour.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s also the fact that Russia never really seemed to account for most of its monetary and material taps getting turned off. When you’re (ALLEGEDLY) throwing conscripts out there without even a single full magazine of ammo, you’re burning through old post-WWII ammo stocks, and constantly having to beg old SSR states “hey can we buy/borrow some of your tanks and APCs please,” it doesn’t look great.

        • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The trouble is, the material taps haven’t turned off they’ve been rerouted. Apparently enforcing sanctions is hard and more importantly also pisses off your donor base consisting of amoral business types. You can find any number of articles of Ukrainian complaining (even years into the war) that they find western electronics in downed Russian missiles.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Really?

    Last I checked, we haven’t had almost 500k casualties and lost billions in military craft to old mothballed weapons we since moved on from.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s actually kinda incredible for Russia to have not realized that the US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment as it runs out of the shitty Soviet era alternatives

      Meanwhile Moscow is instead developing a dependency on Iranian and Chinese made military hardware, stuff that neither is especially willing to part with given their own war plans.

      The US could 1000% just barely provide enough aid to tactically let Russia chew its teeth out trying to break Ukraine, but it’s sending what Ukraine needs to win whenever it can because the US sees Ukraine winning as more important than Russia losing at this point.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment as it runs out of the shitty Soviet era alternatives

        Not just Ukraine, either! All the NATO Eastern Bloc countries donated their Soviet equipment (and much more) and are actively rearming and retraining their own militaries on NATO standard equipment.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Unfortunately “barely enough” is closer to the mark. Ukraine should’ve had this funding last year and we should’ve been close to the next round at this point. If this is actually all America can muster when it is committed to “winning” then then thats a bit sad and scary considering the incompetent broke ass country we are trying to beat while having homecourt advantage.

        The only thing that gives me solace is the thought that this is carefully architected to bleed out Russia and not actually a show of real force.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          8 months ago

          You have to remember that half of the political parties in the US are owned by and promote Russian interests. That’s the only reason it took 8 months to get this funding approved, and it was approved in spite of the former fuckwit president.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          If only they had oil, they’d be a free country neo-colony of Biden a long time ago

              • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                The Black Sea Ukrainian Shelf was discovered in 2012 to contain an estimated 2 trillion cubic meters of natural gas. Access to a huge portion of it depends on Crimea which was annexed in 2014.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        US is literally just letting Ukraine integrate itself into NATO standards by training on and building up NATO standard equipment

        Excellent point. Due to the equipment Ukraine now has the west is at a point where they will stand to lose a lot of valuable technology if Russia wins making it necessary for western intervention if things go bad for Ukraine.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The Kremlin warned that American support for Ukraine could turn into a decade-long folly, urging the U.S. to not oppose its invasion of the country as Congress appears set to pass a $60 billion aid package.

    Buried lede: Russia thinks its “three-day special military operation to de-nazify remove US biolabs de-NATO Ukraine resurrect the Soviet Union” could take a decade. 😂

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also, they think they might need a decade to defeat a power that has a fifth of its military size, and which has, so far, roundly managed to make a laughingstock out of much of the Russian military.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Let’s assume Ukraine and all the funding it receives does delay it a decade and Russia eventually wins.

        Isn’t that still a resounding success delaying Russia by 10 years and crippling them from the extended war?

        It might suck for Ukraine, but from a foreign policy perspective that’s a success

        • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          💯💯💯 these fuckers are enlisting prisoners and using 50 year old tanks. Their readiness is supremely fucked RIGHT NOW let alone a year or more from now.

          Any victory, if ever, will be phyrric at best.

        • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Uhh no it isn’t? What the fuck? The very fact of a war is a foreign policy disaster if you care about the well being of Europe at all. God I hate America sometimes

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The war is inevitable. America doesn’t decide if Russia invades Ukraine or not. It can only decide if it will help Ukraine or not.

            If america helps Ukraine, they will severely cripple Russia, thus making later invasions unlikely.

            I america doesn’t help Ukraine, Russia will just get what they want and move on to invade more countries, leading to more wars.

            You can’t just give a flower to the invader, say “peace” and suddenly there are no more wars.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    funny that the Russkis mention Afghanistan 😅

    And as always, as long as the cunts in Russia are complaining and riding their propaganda train at full speed, we are doing something right.

  • Tebbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ukraine wants the help. Afghanistan didn’t. Also, the Soviet Union did a similar thing in Afghanistan.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    The difference is that Vietnam and Afghanistan were civil wars. It’s very difficult to win a war when a sizable portion of the citizens are fighting against you. Ukraine seems to be very united against a common enemy: Russia.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because Russia had so much success against Afghanistan themselves. Pretty sure they’ve had their asses handed to them in the far east as well.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because Russia had so much success against Afghanistan themselves.

      Despite nominally being a staunch supporter of George Bush Jr’s War on Terror, Afghanistan was one place Putin absolutely refused to give support. You can call it cowardice or wisdom or simply being once-bitten-twice-shy, but the Graveyard of Empires isn’t the place you send in troops casually.

      Pretty sure they’ve had their asses handed to them in the far east as well.

      Do you mean the Russo-Japan War? That was over a century ago.

      With the exception of the First Chechen War, The Post-'91 Russian Federation’s record on the battlefield has generally been successful.

      Russian military leadership is well-blooded and one of the only institutions that wasn’t gutted by Perestroika. The folks who were laughing up their sleeves at the “Oversized Gas Station” when the Ukraine fight started may have underestimated the monster that was unleashed.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean he’s kinda right if we don’t just commit to fully helping Ukraine instead of waffling with every budget, bill, and election.

    But him saying that is a good way to motivate stubborn Americans, so he can keep on saying it. It’ll get us going.

  • cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Vietnam is a pretty darn poor example for them to be bringing up. A much poorer country fights for its independence against bigger countries with seemingly insurmountable advantages (first France, and then the USA). And by dint of sheer national sacrifice, sustained over 20+ years of fighting, manages to outlast the enemy. Don’t forget also that the Vietnamese started from a vastly poorer and more backward position compared to the Ukrainians.

    • TheJims@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nobody knows more about humiliating fiascos in Afghanistan than Russia.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Russia did so well in Afghanistan after the US supplied the afghans with weapons and training.

  • ganksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh well I guess we’ll just take our ball and go home then/s. Jokes on you, we freakin live for failure!