• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I can’t be the only one to notice that Nike thinks that able women should be sexualized, but disabled ones should wear long pants. I’m not sure which women that is more insulting to.

  • ObsidianNebula@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    What’s going on with Nike and their uniforms? The MLB ones are pretty bad where you can basically see through the pants, and now this.

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Gotta grift somewhere. Make that fabric shear so we use less and just call it “breathable” and “form fitted.” And then charge em 3 times more.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I doubt anyone at Nike is giving two shits about the fabric savings for the Olympic team uniforms lol

    • TGTX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Uniforms on the MLB side seem to be getting worse after the start of the season. There have been instances already of pants just ripping apart. Now, there have been sweat stain issues with the uniforms too. Some teams like the Mariners, Rangers, and Brewers are still waiting on full uniform sets. It’s been a chaotic mess.

  • Otakulad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Uniforms should be issued, not designed by the country. Some countries have invested $10,000s of dollars to ensure their athletes have the least amount of drag, namely in swimming. At that point, it isn’t the talent of the athlete, it’s the clothes. Put everyone on even playing ground clothes wise.

    • Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought the same thing. The article mentions Brazilian waxes, and my immediate thought was f-that. Go full bush. You wanna see what my junk is really like? Feel free to view it in its natural state.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      And that argument is discussed in the article. Doesn’t mean it isn’t sexist

      • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        how is it sexist? women are allowed to wear the mens gear if they want. it’s up to the athlete to choose.

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Too bad the promotional image doesn’t show more than one option for each gender, and itself shows the different aesthetic expectations of men and women competing in the Olympics.

      • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        that’s a failure of the publication, not nike. like i said, it’s sensationalism at it’s best.