• RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s not whataboutism is lol.

    He’s not defending/minimizing doing something by pointing out the others have also done it… he’s comparing 2 situations, and saying that the definition of genocide is not limited to extinction.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      But what about this other thingggggg it’s completely relevanttt what about this thing tho it’s just like this what about that thing remember that thing? Oh my I know it doesn’t really have to do anything to do with this but what about that

      • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        He said “by your definition this <other genocide> would not be considered one” (which it is).

        He’s not doing anything related to whataboutism, you clearly don’t know what it means. He’s presenting an argument for the definition and common usage of the word genocide. Try to follow

        • PatFusty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not in agreement with that either. I don’t agree that native Americans were involved in a genocide. I would imagine most people would agree with that. It’s a whatabout to me because it’s not even in a similar circumstance. If you look at actual examples of genocide it doesn’t look like native America or Gaza.