Google might start charging for access to search results that use generative artificial intelligence tools. That’s according to a new Financial Times report citing “three people with knowledge of [Google’s] plans.”

Charging for any part of the search engine at the core of its business would be a first for Google, which has funded its search product solely with ads since 2000. But it’s far from the first time Google would charge for AI enhancements in general; the “AI Premium” tier of a Google One subscription costs $10 more per month than a standard “Premium” plan, for instance, while “Gemini Business” adds $20 a month to a standard Google Workspace subscription.

While those paid products offer access to Google’s high-end “Gemini Advanced” AI model, Google also offers free access to its less performant, plain “Gemini” model without any kind of paid subscription.

  • evergreen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Paying for the privilege of using AI to sift through the vast bleak sea of AI generated garbage. What a time to be alive!

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good news, in my opinion. I don’t think users see the value in of AI and so maybe sites will go back to catering to organic results instead.

    Just kidding Google will just make the non-AI search experience so bad that people are forced to sign up for their AI subscription

  • eronth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh thank god, I’ll be able to avoid seeing it by just not paying.

  • coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    This means we won’t be getting the results we already get.

    Or we are going to get the results we got when google was good, but with money.

    “We ruin results until payments improve.”

  • Harry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Pay for this thing you never wanted or you won’t get it!!!”

    Oh no! Anyway.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m all for this!

    It’s what basically every other AI tool wants to do, because building and operating LLM’s at this scale is horrifically expensive.

    So let them do it. Those that want these tools will pay, and the 99.999% of people that don’t give a fuck about AI can just continue as normal.

    Hell, if Google want to deshitify their search by removing the ML nonsense they’ve been loading into it for the last decade or so, even better! Let me pay for that too, and I’ll pay them exactly nothing.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Would love to see Google do pay to play for this instead of devious pay with your usage data and ads (although likely they will do both)

    • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The largest number in the world isn’t big enough to describe the % chance they double dip. Ironically I think the 2nd largest numbers are called googols, after grahams number, IIRC.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not entirely sure that’s how percentages work here, but regardless maybe they’ll give you a reach around or something on this plan at least…