• Yaztromo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Growing up my mother would occasionally make a dish my father enjoyed that she called “Depression Dinner”. It was mashed potatoes covered in fried ground beef with beef gravy poured on top of it.

    I like mashed potatoes. I like using ground beef in a variety of dishes. And who can say anything bad about gravy? But mix those three together — ugh, no thanks. It was like baby food for adults. There was a reason why my brother and I took to calling it Depressing Dinner growing up.

      • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh certainly changing the presentation, texture, and separation of the ingredients can make a big difference in a dish! I’d say the difference between “depression dinner” and Shepard’s pie is like the difference between cake batter and cake — they’re both made up of the exact same stuff, but one is a gloopy mess you’d probably not want to eat a whole bowl of, and the other is delicious cake you’ll want a second serving of.

        • JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I hear ya, altho at the same time your DD as is doesn’t sound that bad to me.

          Of course, I’d want to drain the hell out of that ground beef and cook it with some chili mix, too. Without some simple steps like that I could indeed see how it might taste more like oily Gerbers.

          • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            To be clear — Mom’s “Depression Dinner” was in fact just greasy fried ground beef poured over mashed potatoes. No spices. I don’t even think she used any salt or pepper. Oily Gerbers would be a perfectly apt description!

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Similar to beef mince, onions, gravy and mash for me. My da loves it but I found the combo depressing despite the fact I used to eat mash out of the pot with a spoon. And yes I’m Irish.

    • flubba86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I once found a Cafe Latte flavoured yoghurt. I thought it would be amazing. Tasted it and immediately regretted it. It tasted just absolutely awful, I can’t even describe it.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Really unpopular opinion, peanut butter and jelly. I do not like them together nor do I even like peanut butter with added sugar.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Mostly not picky anymore but oh how I hate raisins or grapes in curry or any savory dish. Yuck, yuck, yuck. Really picky about fruit in anything, apple in mulligatawny and in chicken salad eew.

    But the Mexican fruit salad that has mango, pineapple, jicama, orange and ONION and crumbled cheese? I love it and nobody else in my household does.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Garbage plates, holy crap. For those of you who don’t know, a garbage plate refers to a famous “cuisine” in Upstate New York, comprising of random picnic ingredients thrown together like a salad and is understandably the butt of many jokes because it is to cuisine what the back-scratching-hair-combing-nose-picking-ukulele-tuner is to inventions. On top of that, every restaurant has its own take on it that varies the recipe, so you will never know exactly how it is unless you’ve already touched that particular restaurant. The one time where I’d prefer each set to be sold separately (and batteries to not be included, gawd).

  • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Anything “salad” where the salad includes tuna, mayo, or egg. I can’t handle it. I don’t know why. Egg salad. Tuna salad. 🤢

    I like salad. I like eggs. I like tuna somewhat. I like mayo somewhat. But any of those weird combinations make me sick.

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      First generation montrealer here of Italian descent: that sauce is a bastardized Greek meat sauce, there is nothing remotely spaghetti or Italian about it.

      I actually love Italian poutine for what it is, but I would never put that sauce on spaghetti or call a sauce that routinely contains cinnamon and oregano an Italian sauce.

      • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Agreed, my comment would be said with the words “Italian” and “spaghetti” in airquotes.

        Never seen one with cinnamon, then again I just don’t order those.
        I’ll have to check with my gf who does.

      • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Bro. Bro.

        Belle province, all dressed steamies and an “Italian” Poutine. My god.

        Sure as fuck ain’t Italian or a good meat sauce but as a combo that shit slaps.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t eat meat anymore but I’m from Cincy and do occasionally crave a 5 way, hell even a 4 or 3 way (yes seriously that’s what our iconic company for this dish calls its dishes, skyline knows what they’re doing). My wife would fucking love this as a poutine as it sounds like it’s just a 3 way with fries instead of spaghetti.

            • Leviathan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Usually it’s fries, curds, fries, curds, sauce. Cheapo places won’t double up the curds but the good places definitely do. If that’s what you have in mind you guys should roll by Montreal.

    • 8dotpi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had to look up what poutine was, and I can assure you that we don’t have anything like that in Italy

  • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I once tried sardine ice cream. I love sardines and I love ice cream. The only place I want them to mix is AFTER they are in my stomach.

  • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Non native english speaker here, not trying to have an argument but to learn.
    Is it correct to use “whose” in this context?

    I kinda thought “whose” was meant to refer to a person and not an object, but really I don’t know.
    Though I’d use something like “of which” or whatever else instead.

    (Or just do what I do and rephrase it so you don’t need to bother with this syntax to begin with.)
    “What is a dish where each individual component you like, but when combined together become a dish you think is nasty?”

    • communism@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not a native English speaker either but I’ve spoken English from a young age. “Whose” is used to denote belonging, not necessarily personhood, which can be confusing as “who” does denote personhood. There isn’t really a “whose” equivalent for objects so it’s used for any noun which another noun belongs to.

      • Jojo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, you shouldn’t use who’s for objects, as in the one “who is” doing something; that should be “that’s” or "which is. But for possession like this case “that’s” doesn’t work at all. “Of which” or “for which” might work in this sentence, but I don’t think any native speaker would be confused by whose here

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Whose” should probably be “thats”. But a native English speaker will occasionally personify things and so the meaning would be the same, but you are correct.

  • idrum4316@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like I’m in the minority on this one, but I don’t like fruit and yogurt together. Individually, they’re great.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m down with carbon, oxygen, phosphorous, and all these other nice elements, but you mix them together in just the right way and you get my ex girlfriend.