dantheclamman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoVinyl records outsell CDs for the second year runningwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up1512arrow-down18
arrow-up1504arrow-down1external-linkVinyl records outsell CDs for the second year runningwww.theverge.comdantheclamman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square129fedilink
minus-squarespyd3r@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down7·edit-210 months agoMost CDs pressed after the mid-90’s are audiological garbage not worth paying for. If the waveform looks like this, I ain’t buying it:
minus-squarearc@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoSo you have a crap master. Compare the same master between compact disc and vinyl when making your judgments.
minus-squareMrScottyTay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·10 months agoThey usually have a higher bitrate than you can get from streaming. There’s not one CD I have that I immediately tell the difference in quality of I switch between streaming (or even a standard mp3 actually) and a CD. CD wins every time.
minus-squareZstom6IP@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoalot of people dont work with audio, but i actually have, you may be downvoted, but you are correct.
Most CDs pressed after the mid-90’s are audiological garbage not worth paying for.
If the waveform looks like this, I ain’t buying it:
So you have a crap master. Compare the same master between compact disc and vinyl when making your judgments.
They usually have a higher bitrate than you can get from streaming. There’s not one CD I have that I immediately tell the difference in quality of I switch between streaming (or even a standard mp3 actually) and a CD. CD wins every time.
alot of people dont work with audio, but i actually have, you may be downvoted, but you are correct.