How does this KEEP GETTING WORSE??

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What do you think would happen if the mod authors filed a DMCA takedown against the game?

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Their lawyers tie you up with a lot of legal fees trying to get you to defend it, if you don’t they take you to court for a frivolous suit.

      Either way they win and you lose, even if you’re right.

      I don’t see it playing out positive unfortunately.

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ahahahaha I want to live in your world instead of the one we actually live in.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      60
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Nothing. Modders suddenly feeling they should be paid is really entitled and kind of crazy. Hey I made some fan art of a marvel character, should marvel pay me?

      Modding isn’t a job, and you can’t make money off of someone else’s game

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re conflating two different things.

        There’s modders who whine about working for free. And yes, modding is a choice.

        Where in this incident is stolen work.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          55
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It’s not work . I’m currently modding a game, it’s a hobby. And I’d be entitled as hell to think I should be paid for it.

          This “pay the modders” thing will just lead to more micro transactions. You want to download that created wrestler in the new game? It was made by so and so, you now owe. $9.99. fuck that

          • ringwraithfish@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you make something and give it away for free, that’s fine.

            If you make something and I sell it to the masses for a profit without your permission that’s theft.

          • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            9 months ago

            Can you link your mod files so I can sell them without your knowledge or consent please? Seeing as you have no problem with it…

          • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s not about pay the modders so much as if the developer of the game took your mod, put it in the game proper, claimed it was their work, and charged people for it.

            • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              9 months ago

              Nobody hired you to mod someone else’s art. It’s a hobby. I can’t put brush to someone else’s painting and demand payment

      • skulblaka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Hey I made some fan art of a marvel character, should marvel pay me?

        When they use that fan art in the next official marvel movie, yes absolutely they should.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          35
          ·
          9 months ago

          But it’s their character, you didn’t ask permission to make the art out of a copyright, why should they pay you?

          • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s their character, but it’s your work.

            They cant just steal your work for their own monetary gain, just the same as you cant steal their character for your own monetary gain.

            Both sides have contributed something here, but one side is profiting off the other through theft.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              But the rub is, under fair use you can’t profit from it though, so as soon as you accept payment, now they can sue you. So in the end, they win and get it for free regardless.

              • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                If the rights holders enter into a contract and pay you for your work, I don’t think they can turn around and sue you for making a profit off of it. I’m no lawyer, but I don’t think the law is that far gone.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  But how can they make a contract? Signing it would violate fair use exemption before that could be argued.

                  Corps are abusing a conflict within the laws, it’s not even a loophole, it’s just the unfortunate way the laws that protect each person/industry don’t agree.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Profit is not explicitly one of the four factors of fair use.

      • CTDummy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That isn’t what a DMCA is for. Someone being compensated for the work they’ve done is unrelated to suing a company for using your art/code/work without permission or reference. Weirdly aggressive to modders though.

        Edit: for your edit, you can’t monetise a mod for someone’s else’s game directly but you can absolutely make money modding. And even if their EULA enables them to do so, taking a modders code without at least a reference is pretty dogshit. Literally a million dollar studio ripping off people who did it out of passion knowing full well they wouldn’t get compensated. I’m surprised a EULA can protect them legally for doing it tbh.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    And this is not even beginning to touch content and features from other released versions of these games from 20 years ago not present, like four-screen splitscreen."

    It’s so cool and amazing that we finally have home theatre systems in every fucking house, and that’s when devs decided we don’t get split screen anymore. Modern hardware is wasted on modern devs. Can we send them back in time to learn how to optimize, and bring back the ones that knew how to properly utilize hardware?

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Modern hardware is wasted on modern devs. Can we send them back in time to learn how to optimize, and bring back the ones that knew how to properly utilize hardware?

      I think a lot of the blame is erroneously placed on devs, or it’s used as a colloquialism. Anyone who has worked in a corporate environment as a developer knows that the developers are not the ones making the decisions. You really think that developers want to create a game that is bad, to have their name attached to something that is bad and to also know that they created something that is bad? No, developers want to make a good game, but time constraints and horrible management prioritizing the wrong things (mostly, microtransactions, monetizing the hell out of games, etc) results in bad games being created. Also, game development is more complex since games are more complex, hardware is more complex, and developers are expected to produce results in less time than ever before - it’s not exactly easy, either.

      It’s an annoyance of mine and I’m sure you meant no harm by it, but as a developer (and as someone who has done game development on the side and knows a lot about the game development industry), it’s something that bothers me when people blame bad games solely on devs, and not on the management who made decisions which ended up with games in a bad state.

      With that said, I agree with your sentiments about modern hardware not being able to take advantage of long-forgotten cool features like four-screen splitscreen, offline modes (mostly in online games), arcade modes, etc. I really wish these features were prioritized.

      • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree with you on this point. I think”devs” is conflated for the developing company and its management and not individual devs.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not a question of capability. It’s a question of cost-benefit spending developer time on a feature not many people would use.

      Couch coop was a thing because there was no way for you to play from your own homes. Nowadays it’s a nice-to-have, because you can jump online any time and play together, anywhere in the world, without organizing everyone to show up at one house.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      4x splitscreen needs approximately 4x VRAM with modern approaches to graphics: If you’re looking at something sufficiently different than another player there’s going to be nearly zero data in common between them, and you need VRAM for both sets. You go ahead and make a game run in 1/4th of its original budget.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I can’t do that, but you know who could? The people who originally made the game. Had they simply re-released the game that they already made, it wouldn’t be an issue. Us fans of the old games didn’t stop playing because the graphics got too bad. Even if we did, this weird half step towards updating the graphics doesn’t do anything for me. Low poly models with textures that quadruple the game’s size are the worst possible middle ground.

        My flatmates and I actually played through a galactic conquest campaign on the OG battlefront 2 like 2 months ago. It holds up.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I can’t do that, but you know who could? The people who originally made the game.

          How to tell me you’re not a gamedev without telling me you’re not a gamedev. You don’t just turn a knob and the game uses less VRAM, a 4x budget difference is a completely new pipeline, including assets.

          Low poly models with textures that quadruple the game’s size are the worst possible middle ground.

          Speaking about redoing mesh assets. Textures are easy, especially if they already exist in a higher resolution which will be the case for a 2015 game, but producing slightly higher-res meshes from the original sculpts is manual work. Topology and weight-painting at minimum.

          So, different proposal: Don’t do it yourself. Scrap together a couple of millions to have someone do it for you.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Seems like Tomb raider collection was the fluke, because that one is almost perfect. But I tried out the dark forces remastered and was met with a godawful AI laser rifle with visible artifacts.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Embracer, actually, and while I do suspect that the blame for a lot of these problems lies with them (especially the lack of servers, which was almost certainly down to Embracer cheaping out), it’s hard to blame this particular failure on anyone but Aspyr. While Embracer almost certainly created the conditions by not giving them enough time and resources to deliver good work, it’s still on Aspyr that they used someone’s work without permission. There’s no real justification for that, even if you’re in a bind.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      There were two heroes that were released as Xbox exclusive DLC back during the original release - Kit Fisto and Asajj Ventress. The mod added them into the PC version by reskinning Ki Adi Mundi and Ayla Secura respectively. The Aspyr release uses the reskinned versions from the mod rather than the official models from Pandemic/Lucasarts which they presumably had permission to use but chose not to despite the fact that the original models don’t have graphical errors and do have the correct fighting style/animations.