You must log in or # to comment.
Also
The lines in this are askew and it’s mildly annoying
They’re there to askew why the logic doesn’t work.
Not true. If you define the circumference in terms of pi, you can define the circumference exactly.
“Find” not “define”
Technically you can’t measure anything accurately because there’s an infinite amount of numbers between 1 and 0. Whose to say it’s exactly 1? It could be off by an infinite amount of 0s and 1.
Achilles and the Tortoise paradox.
Not if your diameter is d/pi. Then your circumference is d, where d > 0.
Check mate atheists.
Check mate matheists.
Ftfy.
Joke’s on them, tears are too salty to provide hydration.
Prove it.
Ahem. MathEmaticians.
Pi is 3.
Ah, the Euler identity. 3^i ^3 -1=0
Rofl :D Well, close enough, and about as sexy when a bit drunk.
Besides measuring it with a measuring tape.
And you can’t trust anything calculated with an imaginary number. Common guys, it’s right there. It’s imaginary like the, totally not AI, person I’m pretending to be.
