The US will send $300m (£234m) in military weapons to Ukraine, including ammunition, rockets and anti-aircraft missiles, the White House has said.

The surprise announcement comes as a bill in Congress to send further aid to Ukraine stalls amid partisan debate.

The US shipment, the first in nearly three months, is intended to prevent Ukraine from losing ground to Russia.

National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said this aid “is nowhere near enough to meet Ukraine’s battlefield needs”.

“This ammunition will keep Ukraine’s guns firing for a period, but only a short period,” Mr Sullivan told reporters on Tuesday, adding that “it will not prevent Ukraine from running out of ammunition.”

  • twistypencil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can someone explain if the white house can do this, why didn’t they do it before and we had to wade through partisan nonsense?

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The White House had a budget previously approved by Congress for Pentagon operations, and that budget was not fully expended due to internal cost savings, giving the WH room to reallocate some of it. But this is just a drop in the bucket, Congress needs to act on the larger support package and provide dedicated funds for the effort.

    • TBi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. Politically it may cause issues. Diplomacy is usually the best route.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Wow, it’s like you said nothing about anything.

        You would make a great politician.

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    9 months ago

    Imagine using these money to make something useful and not to fuel wars and dictatorships

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, defending the borders of a sovereign, democratic state from invasion, rape, murder and genocide seems like “something useful” to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ukraine is not a democracy anymore it’s a military state under martial law where no man between 18 and 60 can surpass an invisible line on the map or they would get arrested. There are a thousand ways to help ukrainian people that don’t involve forcing them into a proxy war against russia. For example sanctioning Arab Emirates where russian are chilling or stopping business partnerships with china who is providing russia weapons. Politicians simply are not interested in this, they seek profits and building weapons and giving them to other governments is an investment for them and a tool to increase their power. The west and russia too are supporting and making possible a genocide in gaza right now, rulers don’t care about people.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          it’s a military state under martial law

          Every state for the last 2500 years (and probably before) has had the possibility martial law and every democracy in the world has it now. Sometimes martial law is necessary, like when people come to rape your sister and murder your grandmother and wipe out your culture.

          It does not make a country “not a democracy anymore” to use it appropriately and there is no question that it’s being used appropriately here.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ukraine can’t win without foreign troops on the ground, though.

        This is just using them as cannon fodder to weaken Russia.

        I feel bad for the Ukrainians duped by the West into thinking they actually have a chance because of some weapons.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Jaaayyyysus…All you ever do is come into these threads repeating “Ukraine can’t win without foreign troops on the ground” over and over and over.

          4 times in the last 2 days by my quick check. (edit: sorry, 5 and more if we go back to 3 days)

          Alright, alright. We heard you. You can stop saying it now.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Winning isn’t invading Russia. Winning is pushing Russia out. It’s looking grim for the Ukraine but it’s not impossible for them to win.

          If all the lefties would go of there they’d be able to win but that has not happened yet.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      So you dont think saving the lives of Ukrainian children is useful?

      • mxl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Lol the least thing the US government cares about is saving anyone’s life.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Fueling the war with more weapons like cluster munitions is the opposite of helping ukrainian children. The white house is ok with killing thousand of children in gaza, what make you think they care more about the ones in ukraine?

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hey, thanks for outing yourself as a Russian troll farm account so I can add you to my blacklist very kind of you. :)

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What makes you think i work for the russian government when i’m calling out them all for being corrupted scum?

  • Lung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yep remember all that showmanship about how the Republicans in Congress are evil and preventing aid. Well, then white house just decided to send it anyway, as if that wasn’t always an option…

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If passed, the aid bill will send $60 billion to Ukraine.

      Biden just scrounged up $0.3 billion for Ukraine.

      They are not the same.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Always helps to read the articles. It was money already allocated

      Tuesday’s emergency package of weapons and equipment comes from cost savings made in earlier Ukraine weapon contracts

    • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m always impressed at how technology has evolved enough to allow people as retarded as you to manage navigating the internet to type braindead shit like this

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As a developer from Budapest, why do you give a fuck about US politics? I don’t have any opinions on the politics of Budapest because I don’t give a fuck. I don’t live there. It’s not my problem.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      either troll farm account or your mom did meth when she was pregnant.

    • harderian729@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      They need to wait until it’s politically convenient.

      The democrats have drip-feeding what the people want down to a science.

  • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Only 300m to fight an invader but 14b to butcher children and civilians in general? Wow Biden, much nice, you’re definitely the better option. Edit: I’m definitely not pro-Trump, I’m just one of many, many fed up people who hoped for something other than a Biden-Trump rematch. But I guess fanatics gonna be fanatics.