• NIB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Without immediate action, this situation could escalate into a major environmental crisis,” said Julien Jreissati, program director at Greenpeace MENA.

    “As well as any further leaks of fuel oil from the engines, the sinking of the vessel could further breach the hull, allowing water to contact with the thousands of tonnes of fertilizer, which could then be released into the Red Sea and disrupt the balance of the marine ecosystems, triggering cascading effects throughout the food web.”

    Good job Houthi, you saved Gaza.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yep that’s how this works.

      Raise some hell, destroy some things and when governments start losing money they come to the negotiating table.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yemen and Gaza have the right to defend themselves. If you dont want oil tankers in the red sea you’d simply now ignore the Yemeni navy’s warning to ships to not pass the strait if you’re going to do business with the UK, US, or Israel.

      • NIB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Do you honestly think they are actually choosing which ships to target? They literally attacked a ship going to Iran

        https://apnews.com/article/yemen-ship-missile-houthi-rebels-attack-bab-elmandeb-strait-999b911c916f9266c07a6d29cc020e9e

        Would you be ok if the american navy started shooting iranian civilian ships? Are we saying that civilian targets going through international waters are valid military targets? Should other countries do that too?

        What would become of the world then? Do you think that would improve the world? If any country starts hitting civilian targets? Why stop at ships? Why not start nuking cities because you dont like something? As long as you have, what you consider, a “valid” ethical issue you should be allowed to do anything you want.

          • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re delusional. The houthis are shitth. The idf and the houthis can both be shitty at the same time. Two wrongs don’t make a right, it’s not hard to understand.

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Ansarallah has said specifically that they will stop if there is a permanent ceasefire. That is the one demand.

          • NIB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Should the american navy start sinking russian civilian ships to make Russia stop invading Ukraine?

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              No one thinks through the things they say here. It’s just what feels good in the moment. At this point any country has free reign to attack any vessel they desire in international waters. Shit, Japan should start launching rockets at Chinese civilian ships because of Hong Kong/Taiwan; US should attack any Russian civilian ships because of Ukraine; any other military operations we should be conducting around the world on behalf of anyone?

    • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hey now, there’s a lot of people who’ve only just learned that Houthi exists that’ll be very mad at you.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Like how the top 3 comments are concerned about the ecological impacts and not the fact that attacking a supply line was probably the first thing thought of after the invention of war.

  • splitz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Good bye local fisheries. Hello starvation, my old friend.

    Who did this to us?!?

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Israel, US, and UK. They were fine with just seizing ships and turning them back but since the genocide-loving asshats bombed them theyre going to hit back.

  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    The attacks have also disrupted aid shipments to both Yemen and Sudan, which is gripped by its own monthslong war. In recent days, the International Rescue Committee said it suspended its aid shipments to Port Sudan through the Red Sea over long delays and drastically increased costs. 

    Also:

    The approximately 21,000 metric tons of ammonium phosphate sulfate fertilizer that the vessel was carrying presents an environmental risk in the Red Sea,”

    At this point, anyone unquestionably defending the Houthis as this noble fighting force standing for Hamas has a questionable narrative they are pushing. And I see the same person commenting all over and glazing for the houthis like they are the second coming of the Messiah.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve yet to see eco-fascists going “tHanKs HouThis yOu SaVEd gAzA!!” shedding a single tear for Gaza, where Israeli uranium, lead, and phosphorus have turned the very soil that once hosted olive trees into an uninhabitable zone rife with cancer, blight, and birth defects.

    • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You won’t. They will happily buy tons of utilities, food and other resources from their colonies all over the world, including oil to wage their wars and plastic shit to use once and throw, for dirt cheap. When you block their pleasure and oppression toys, they will cry “think of the children, think of the environment, you barbarians that can’t carpet bomb or nuke people to stand behind your claims!” while ordering the newest Iphone on their way to change their 3 year old cars for whatever came out this week.

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Prior to the attacks, they would pay a 0.02% insurance premium to transit the Red Sea – or $20,000. Now that has jumped to upwards of 1% - or a cool $1 million. That is, if insurers are willing to underwrite the ship at all – which several insurers are no longer willing to do with ships affiliated with the United States, United Kingdom or Israel, which the Houthis have vowed to target.

    Skill issue, I would simply stop supply the genocidal ethnostate

    • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m gonna make a guess and say this is more effective than the sanctions imposed on Russia.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      No one thinks through the things they say here. It’s just what feels good in the moment. At this point any country has free reign to attack any vessel they desire in international waters. Shit, Japan should start launching rockets at Chinese civilian ships because of Hong Kong/Taiwan; US should attack any Russian civilian ships because of Ukraine; any other military operations we should be conducting around the world on behalf of anyone?

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Strange, when t came to Ukraine we had to block Swift and seize all Russian assets.

        But when israel is comitting literal Genocide we really care about international law but only when it’s people trying to stop the Genocide. Because we’re doing the Genocide and that’s fine.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Why is this British ship illegally trespassing in Yemeni waters? Did israel stop their Genocide in Gaza?

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because it was in international waters and has nothing to do with the war, yet was still sunk by terrorists?

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s weird. Can you tell me why Britain is bombing Yemen if they are not at war to defend israel? Is it a “special military operation”?

            • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              That ship was bombing Yeman? Last I checked it was carrying civilian cargo across international waters when it was attacked by terrorists launching rockets at them.

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                Let’s israelify it: The ship could have been carrying a Nulear bomb for israel to throw on Gaza. Which is why it should have gone through the Yemeni terrorist border screening checkpoint to make sure it was not delivering nuclear weapons to israel.

                But since they didn’t it’s now a valid target :)

                • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah no, this is just terrorists deliberately targeting civilians since they’re incapable of targeting military targets with any success. The same exact thing Hamas has been doing for years.