• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This deliberately misguiding title is as myopic as the news talking about Bitcoin “crashes”.

    Ten years ago, the EV auto market share was under 1% and Bitcoin was worth 320 bucks.

    Ten years later, 10% of cars are EVs, 30% of the car market will be pure EVs, more will be hybrids, bitcoin is worth 62,000 dollars.

    2024 headlines: Bitcoin crashes again and Toyota won’t waste money on EVs.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They literally call their hydrogen car the future. Toyota has been trying, and is still avoiding making purely electric vehicles.

      Of all their models, Toyota only sells one EV in the US. Your aspirational assumptions about Toyota are nothing more than that.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Not that there’s anything wrong with hydrogen cars, but they only add to my point.

        Dumb headlines focusing on extremely short-term “setbacks” ignoring how rapidly things have progressed and are progressing from just a decade ago.

    • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you think 2030 is 10 years away? In 10 years, it will be 2034 when most countries will require 100% of new vehicles to not have fossil fuel ICEs.

      They are still stupidly pushing for hydrogen electric vehicles. That is just a BEV with an additional step.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why are you upset about fcevs? If hydrogen works out, great, it’s a sustainable vehicle with tremendous potential.

        If not and Toyota switches to a larger BEV catalogue, great, they’re sustainable vehicles with tremendous potential.

        • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The numbers do not work for FCEVs unless fossil fuels are used which is what 100% of the hydrogen in the current supply line depends on. I know people like to think that we can just use the excess energy from wind farms or solar but that is nowhere near a viable solution.

          Research into hydrogen vehicles is fine but it is a vast waste of resources for consumer vehicles. They have promise in other types of vehicles but it is silly to slow down investment in consumer BEVs to push for consumer FCEVs.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It was silly to slow down investment in EVs a hundred fifty years ago when they were developed, I’m perfectly willing to support people trying different potentially sustainable experimentats now that EVs have been established as the future

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Let’s turn clean water — something already getting difficult to come by — into fuel! What could go wrong?