• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    All Capitalists Are Bastards.

    American Cops are bullies, they might beat you to death, but a capitalist… They won’t even leave a drop of blood after sucking your exploited husk dry.

    Even fascists will remember who they kill as some monstrous victory of hatred in their fucked, genocidal heads, as the murder is the point, but capitalists are the opposite in temperament: cold, unfeeling reptiles. They’ll knowingly poison a town of children if it means more profit, pay the paltry fine, and never bother learning the name of the town they poisoned, just an irrelevant speedbump to glorious profit.

    It is just business after all. And it’s bonkers what that phrase has successfully become an accepted excuse for, despite essentially having the same meaning as “just following orders.”

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Don’t forget a major contributor to minority oppression, too. Police in Capitalistic society are multifaceted and multi-roled.

    • RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “Just business” “Just following orders” “It is what it is” “What can you do?”

      These all sound equivalent because they are. Their linguistic purpose represents a “thought terminating cliche”.

      We say these things when we don’t want to spend any more time thinking about something, or don’t want to think about it at all. It can be laziness or outright avoidance, but it often leads people marginalized or persecuted. For this reason anytime I hear a phrase like this come out of my mouth I try to pause & consider if I’m about to hurt someone that I could easily avoid hurting.

      Edit: thought terminating cliches in and of themselves are not a bad thing. They also keep us from getting stuck in paradox loops like a machine. Sometimes things you don’t have agency at all over are better just not to think about too hard to avoid bitterness. It’s important though that it doesn’t become a reflex and instead is utilized as a coping mechanism.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Cereal is expensive. This is bad advice even without considering the conflict of interest or the fact this man is a tool.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Fuck Kellogg’s but buying cereal in those bulk bags instead of in boxes literally makes cereal cost half as much. You pay out the ass for the privilege of a box.

      In my experience, you save more buying cereal in bulk than most other foods, even ones more commonly bought in bulk.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Fun fact, as I wrote in another comment, it’s often the same cereal. Copying that comment here:

        A roommate of mine who was an Econ major told me once that the knockoff bag cereals are often made by the same company that makes the name brand. That they’re the exact same product.

        He said this is because there isn’t really much crossover between the market segments. People don’t comparison shop the bag cereal, they buy it because it’s cheaper and they wouldn’t buy the box cereal otherwise. And people who buy box cereal don’t really buy bag cereal. There’s no competition between the segments.

        So if Kellogg’s or Post or General Mills makes the same cereal and throws it in a bag under a different brand name with a random title, they make more money than they would if they left that segment of the market to another player.

        This is the same reason Costco and Sam’s Club brands have products that compare well with the brand names…they’re the exact same product, sold under a cheaper brand. Brew Dr can sell their kombucha under their brand at one price, but ALSO make kombucha and sell it under the Kirkland brand, and they’ll make money on both products.

    • ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t mean to defend him at all (in fact, I do eat cereal, but it’s local store brands and not Kellogg’s), but isn’t it normal for a person selling a product to tell people to buy its products?

      At the same time, I agree it’s terrible advice he’s giving!!!

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 months ago

    Assuming someone by necessity needed to do that, then a bowl of porridge would be better than cereal. It would be cheaper to buy, more filling & nutritious. And someone that cash strapped shouldn’t be eating Kelloggs cereals at all since the generic equivalent probably costs half the price and tastes the same.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      A roommate of mine who was an Econ major told me once that the knockoff bag cereals are often made by the same company that makes the name brand. That they’re the exact same product.

      He said this is because there isn’t really much crossover between the market segments. People don’t comparison shop the bag cereal, they buy it because it’s cheaper and they wouldn’t buy the box cereal otherwise. And people who buy box cereal don’t really buy bag cereal. There’s no competition between the segments.

      So if Kellogg’s or Post or General Mills makes the same cereal and throws it in a bag under a different brand name with a random title, they make more money than they would if they left that segment of the market to another player.

      This is the same reason Costco and Sam’s Club brands have products that compare well with the brand names…they’re the exact same product, sold under a cheaper brand. Brew Dr can sell their kombucha under their brand at one price, but ALSO make kombucha and sell it under the Kirkland brand, and they’ll make money on both products.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly.

        Another way to look at this is: It’s not the store brand version that’s marked down, it’s the “name brand” version that’s marked up.

      • Brad Boimler@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        So a former home office employee of Walmart it is what’s left after the name brand run it is what isn’t up to snuff for the name brand that is why off brand vegetables have more stems and stuff etc in them.

      • TwentySeven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just because they’re made in the same factor doesn’t mean they are made to the same specifications. Often the store brand foods are made with cheaper ingredients, even if it’s on the same assembly line

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    When I stopped eating cereal for breakfast, I lost weight and improved my blood sugar levels. If you want diabetes, go ahead and eat cereal.

    • arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That largely depends on the cereal. In the UK there are popular cereal types which have very little sugar in them - oats, weetabix, shredded wheat, ready brek that are fine for diabetics. The worst offenders would be kids cereals & anything overtly sugary as well as things like granola, muesli etc. Things like cornflakes, shreddies, rice krispies sit somewhere at the low end - not healthy per se but fairly low in sugar

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re all, perhaps with the exception of raw steel-cut oats, or plain bran, pretty simple carbohydrates, and you add sugar in the form of lactose on top to eat them. Pretty sure none of them are a net positive to health.

        • arc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          They’re all, perhaps with the exception of raw steel-cut oats, or plain bran, pretty simple carbohydrates, and you add sugar in the form of lactose on top to eat them. Pretty sure none of them are a net positive to health.

          The UK diabetes website says they’re fine. I’m sure if you were diabetic you would be extra careful about milk, portion size though. For everyone else they’re about as low sugar as cereal gets, whether we’re talking breakfast cereal, or cereal in fields cereal.

  • Lommy241@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why would anyone be surprised? A good CEO has the best interests of a company in mind.

    • UckyBon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      No one is surprised. They’re just pointing out that a good CEO is a bad person. We don’t need that in our society. Only the rich need that.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      We shouldn’t glorify antisocial professions.

      Being a CEO of a publically traded company has become a firmly antisocial profession.

      These people don’t work to benefit society, they work to benefit themselves exclusively by extracting as much as they can from society.

      Then again, our culture seems to despise people in pro-social vocations like teachers and nurses, so maybe I’m wrong and we should keep trying to beat each other to death and fuck each other over to “win.” Maybe, if we do it well enough, we’ll be gone, which means the planet wins.