• zaph@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Emotional distress” is not “made me upset”. It’s “murdered my wife and kids in front of my eyes so now I have PTSD and need therapy for life”.

    New to US civil law?

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nope. See Jane W. v. President & Directors of Georgetown Coll., 863 A.2d 821, 826–27 (D.C. 2004), which sets the precedent in Washington, DC where this case was filed. The incident occurred in Washington, DC.

      You must be in physical danger to claim negligent infliction of emotional distress in DC. This case is where the DC Court of Appeals ruled that if you were not in danger then you’re not entitled to damages.

      Feel free to cite a relevant DC authority to the contrary if you think I’m wrong.