• Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the ACTUAL anti-porn motivation the right has? It’s not protecting children, the right HATE children. How does banning porn make old people richer? Somebody follow the money for me.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering TERF island are all time champions it’s a given that as always they’ll go home with a gold medal in this one, however my sources predict a loss in the “have a sufficiently functional state apparatus to actually enforce such a law” competition.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I guarantee that’s not happening lol

    They’ve been repeatedly bringing up laws like this, then they get scrapped because they’re utterly unenforceable. It’s been happening ever since Theresa May was still David Cameron’s cabinet Home Secretary.

    Just headlines meant to appeal to old conservatives obsessed with everybody’s sex lives, with the bonus of the government paying millions to their mates’ “consultancy firms”.

  • PlantObserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can vouch for airvpn if any of you poor saps need to get one. I’ve been through several and settled on airvpn in the end.

    General rule if you see YouTube sponsor ads for a VPN steer the other way. (IE Nord, Surfshark, etc.)

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    We have no infrastructure to support this ban, just like when ISPs were ordered to block porn by default. Nothing ever happens.