• Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    258
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m a fan of this. It’s better to offer content with context and education than to fully censor it.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      11 months ago

      100% this is the way things should be handled. If we get rid of or hide mistakes of the past, they will simply be repeated as people forget.

      A note about historical context is an easy, and small solution to acknowledge the change in society without altering the original content.

  • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is fine, no issues really, but if you’re offended by something in a video game fictional story that was made over 20 years ago you should go touch grass.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They did the same thing with the Destroy All Humans! remakes. Which was probably needed, because the Japanese level in 2 is really iffy

      • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        eh. i get the ‘need’ for these companies to have the disclaimers and i honestly appreciate that they are not changing anything here. but the mob is fickle and seemingly can’t distinguish real life from the online life where being offended somehow gives them clout.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah the Japan level made my jaw drop… the early 2000’s really were the last time you could be this blatantly racist against the Asian Community in popular media… But I’d rather go “Oooof” than pretend the game and by extension society was never like this.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Even if I agree some games have gone too far on censorship, I don’t like having this totalitarian attitude to any kind of “offense”.

      There are certain weird themes I really like in niche games, but I acknowledge if they were “thrown in” to a game about shooting or adventure, would sour the experience for a lot of common players. I’d point to perverted character designs as a common one - sexualized character designs are obviously appealing to some players, but to others they can actually make it hard to get absorbed in the story of a game like Xenoblade Chronicles 2 or Nier Automata. Even for a series like Persona, there have been players that decided “What weeb shit” and abandon the game because of the way female characters get harassed at times.

      It’s easy to call it “political”, but politics comes from personal opinions - and it can genuinely affect how people view the media. These days I have a much more vehement reaction to stereotyped Native-American depictions (“Indians”) over when I was a kid. I doubt it’d make me hate Tomb Raider, but I can see why they’d have a warning.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Honestly I’m glad we’ve moved from “Censor out anything that might be slightly objectionable” (Like they did with Sam & Max for example, and I believe the GTA Trilogy got hit with a bit of this), to “Look the game is old and from a different time, what society deems acceptable is always changing, deal with it or move on.”

    I’m so beyond tired of being told I can’t have a steak because a baby can’t chew it. I actually bought this three pack solely because it didn’t censor Tomb Raider, a game I was very sure they were going to censor

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Like they did with Sam & Max

      I had to look that one up since I had no recollection of anything that stood out as offensive. Most seemed silly to change to me, but I do agree with changing the line about the goggles being designed for special needs children after Sam referred to Max’s “hideously oversized skull.”

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sam & Max didn’t cause that much of a fuss because all purchases of it came with the original version of the game, but the censoring was still cringe.

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      And is what they should do rather than trying to delete it.

      Provide context so that future generations can enjoy what’s good about the media and acknowledge how parts of the content/media are problematic and not appropriate.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Something I and probably everyone else forgets is that Looney Tunes was made in the 1930s and 1940s, not the 1990s.

    • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      No but they have to make it news before some teenager who just learned about virtue signalling goes off on one because their mum paid more attention to Candy Crush than them

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m glad they did that, change on a remake or something, I don’t recall if they actually did it for Anniversary since it was still a ps2 game, but if games are art they should be preserved as they were, this is just a remaster that you can even play with the old graphics if you want.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Isn’t this what the ESRB rating description is for? We label games M for Mature if there’s swearing, blood, violence, and sex, but not for insensitive cultural stereotypes?

  • Ilflish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Neat, I’m with everyone here when I say this is the much better solution.I’d prefer it to be a bit more clear of a warning and a bit less of a company apology so people who do need the warnings such as younger kids are informed and not immediately put off by playing something almost immediately presented as ‘inexcusable’.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ermahgerd! Why dey gutta ram politics into mah games, they’re ruining my heritage or something I dunno, rabble rabble!!!

    /s for the morons