• Nudding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wonder if you could see the meteor in the sky approaching in the days and hours leading up it.

    • OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fun fact: I heard that the meteor was not actually what killed them off, but rather even before that, changes in the atmosphere had already begun to make ginormous lizards a less viable solution.

      Mammals were just so adaptable, that we adapted to the post-meteor changes, even as we had already been adapting to the before-meteor ones.

        • OpenStars@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Even so, one line of thinking along those lines is that the meteor did not in fact kill off the dinosaurs. It did manage to polish them off, but they were decreasing in prominence as mammals increased already. I doubt anyone could prove one way or another, but it’s a fascinating thought to ponder b/c if true, that would mean that the meteor was not the primary cause of their extinction:-). Maybe it was their lack of adaptability? As in, they were fossils even when they were alive:-P.

            • OpenStars@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I know what you mean but… actually it’s more like crocs, alligators, and gila monsters are the “dinosaurs” - especially since that word essentially means “large lizard”:-P. Birds are also their descendents its true but they kinda also have their own thing going on, having abandoned their origins in favor of that.

              You’re not wrong though:-).

                • OpenStars@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  They are not “living large reptiles” though:-P.

                  Likely they are referring to birds being in a monophyletic clade alongside dinos, but by that logic, humans are monkeys.

                  I mean, we are warmblooded, give live birth, have opposable thumbs, etc., so we aren’t “not apes”… but also we are so much more, so very different than how we started.

                  Also, computers are rocks.:-D

                  • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Likely they are referring to birds being in a monophyletic clade alongside dinos, but by that logic, humans are monkeys.

                    I mean we pretty much are. Aside from going hairless and standing upright how much different are we really?

                    Computers are further removed from rocks than a dinosaur is from a mamal.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    I think you’re confusing a word’s origin with what scientists understand now. Please explain the functional difference between a modern bird and a prehistoric theropod.

              • Jorgelino@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Crocs are about as far away from dinosaurs as an archosaur can get. They split off from them very early on. Note where birds fall on this chart on the other hand.