‘Enshittification’ is coming for absolutely everything::The term describes the slow decay of online platforms such as Facebook. But what if we’ve entered the ‘enshittocene’?

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    226
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    A link to an article about enshittification that’s just a solid paywall…

    HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not just a paywall, but a cookie dialog taking up more than my whole phone screen, where you have to click into it to “reject all” (and it doesn’t reject all), just to get to the paywall

    • Lycerius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      A paywall you find only after you have to manually reject cookies. Done? Okay, here’s your paywall!

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ohh no, it’s a real article, if you have bypasspaywall clean you can read it

        I’ll give em a little credit, the article is by Cory Doctorow

        But then we have this:

        "The internet isn’t more important than the climate emergency, gender justice, racial justice, genocide or inequality. But the internet is the terrain we’ll fight those fights on. Without a free, fair and open internet, the fight is lost before it’s joined."
        

        it costs a dollar to read the article.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      When your only claim to fame is jamming the word “shit” into other words…

      You need to milk all that ad money out of it you can.

      • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        FWIW Cory Doctorow was famous before coining that word. He’s done a lot of great work. You should research before saying things.

          • Rolando@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            10 months ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cory_Doctorow

            Awards
            
                2000 John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer[91]
                2004 Locus Award for Best First Novel for Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom
                2004 Sunburst Award for A Place So Foreign and Eight More
                2006 Locus Award for Best Novelette for "I, Robot"
                2007 Locus Award for Best Novelette for "When Sysadmins Ruled the Earth"
                2007 The Electronic Frontier Foundation Pioneer Award[92]
            
            For Little Brother
            
                2009 John W. Campbell Memorial Award[93]
                2009 Prometheus Award[45]
                2009 Sunburst Award[46]
                2009 White Pine Award[94]
                2018 Inkpot Award[95]
            
            For Pirate Cinema
            
                2013 Prometheus Award[45]
            
            For Homeland
            
                2014 Prometheus Award[45]
            
            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Yeah, I saw those on Wikipedia…

              Honestly the only impressive bit was an xkcd character is based on him.

              Like, you know it’s not amount the amount of awards, it’s the quality?

              Like those Prometheus awards, those are just for libertarians and they have like five winners a year.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I don’t think you understand how many awards there are for writing…

                  Do you know about any of those or do you assume any award is prestigious?

          • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            So hard to lift a finger to do the work yourself while you’re shitposting. Follow your own handle’s advice.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Let’s skip for a moment the fact that, as other posters highlighted, Cory Doctorow was already famous before coining the word. Let’s pretend that his only achievement was indeed the concept of enshittification.

        Even then, it’s a big fucking deal. He noticed a rather nasty pattern in a system used by 2/3 of the world population, described it, labelled it, identified potential causes and solutions. It wasn’t just “lol lmao he jammed the word «shit» into another X-D”.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        CD is a beast. One hell of a great guy. I have actually donated money to some of his more worthy causes before.

        Ft It’s kind of a s*** hole though. And for the paywall to abruptly block you outright not a single word not a hook, which is kind of weird because it’s a little bit against what he stands for I know it’s not apples to apples…

        I read the article. It’s kind of disappointing, somewhat of a Nothing Burger.

  • aeharding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    ‘Enshittification’ is coming for absolutely everything

    Subscribe to unlock this article

    • daed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Dude, I was trying to deal with the fucking Fullscreen cookie popup when the subscribe to unlock bullshit popped up and I just closed it immediately

      Couldn’t send that point home any harder

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “See? Look!”

      This article brought to you by the ultimate enshittifier of news, the Financial Times. The reason’s in the name!

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      They really meant it!

      By reading this comment, you consent to cookies btw.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m fine with whatever term we decide means “capitalism fucking sucks”. If we need some new term to escape the current terms that bind folk’s minds all up against their best interests then enshittisication is better than many

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      10 months ago

      Enshitification was coined by Cory Doctrow specifically for the tech space, because the tech space is uniquely poised to constantly shift and tweak a service-based product to manipulate users, creators, and the paying customers.

      I call this enshittification, and it is a seemingly inevitable consequence arising from the combination of the ease of changing how a platform allocates value, combined with the nature of a “two sided market,” where a platform sits between buyers and sellers, holding each hostage to the other, raking off an ever-larger share of the value that passes between them.

      https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/

      This is on top of the normal problem of greed. Now I didn’t read the article because it is pay walled (go figure). Is this article actually drawing a correct comparison to the definition of enshitification above, or is it just lazily ascribing the phenomenon of greed to that word?

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Enshitification was coined by Cory Doctrow specifically for the tech space

        You’re not wrong it was coined this way, but he has referred to the process in other arenas where monopolies exist:

        But it’s not just tech that faces the curse of bigness: your bank, your insurer, your beer company, the companies that make your eyeglasses and your athletic shoes — they’ve all run out of lands to conquer, but instead of weeping, they’re taking it out on you, with worse products that cost more.

        Enshittification follows monopoly as sure as night follows day.

      • nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, because the first guy who lit a fire on purpose was like: “you want warm? You give food! Else fuck off!”

        /s

        • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          To be fair, he may well have been like that. Humans have been selfish bastards since the dawn of time. And maybe this is why we need good government regulations - because human nature is greed. Any company in a position of power will just leech as much money as they can, if nobody is going to stop them.

      • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        I wonder what arguments people have to justify a downvote. Polarized either/or views. Capitalism is a great idea if regulated. Look to history and find good examples of societies that aren’t based on capitalism. They don’t exist.

        I agree and value the Marxist analysis of capitalism. I’m a socialist. However, I don’t think that a Marxist economy would work. Social responsible capitalism works. Capitalism run amok doesn’t. Unfortunately, it is getting out of control, especially in the USA.

        • TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          What we have here is a capitalism that is devoid of the creation of goods and services; today’s capitalism is just neofeudalism in which the capitalist just collects rent without creating anything. This thread is confusing capitalism woth commerce.

        • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you were a socialist you’d know what dialectical materialism is and not say something like “Marxist economy”.

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          What is the solution for when capitalism purchases the regulators? You can purchase SCOTUS rulings for laughably cheap and legislation for even less. If you’re really into it, you can spend several decades building up a propaganda network so low information clowns will vote in an obvious con man. He’ll drop corporate taxes down to zero, give trillions in handouts, and dismantle pesky shit like the EPA. Profits!

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The tech world is going downhill fast. Anything that isn’t currently obtainable through only foss means isn’t going to be attainable by the average person for much longer.

    The tech things most people currently enjoy will soon become entirely unaffordable to anyone not made of money. Anything that you aren’t willing to switch to an open source alternative for, prepare to learn to live without it.

    I even self host my own music streaming. I never had a streaming service, not even in 2012 when Netflix was all the rage. I don’t even own a windows compatible pc. I don’t even know what modern ms office looks like. I use my home network more than I use the actual internet just about.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      What can’t I do with FOSS though?

      Whatever you’re about to say, let’s crowd fund it. I’m not even kidding.

      • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Use industry software standards. Adobe, Autodesk etc etc. I know, these solutions sucks, but it is the world people live it. Most Lemmy people are into tech for the sake of tech. You are technological literate to the highest degree. Understand and critique developments in tech. Very important work! However, a graphical designer probably isn’t that literate and wouldn’t be able to do work in a Foss environment. Yes, 1 in a 1000 might use Gimp but good luck colabbing with other people in the industry.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah I know Gimp doesn’t use(or didn’t last time I checked) CMYK and as someone who does QA for flexographic printing, I know how that’s important.

          You’d think the world would put some effort into getting away from Adobe. All my homies hate Adobe.

          So. Why don’t we crowd fund our way to better solutions for these things?

          • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Krita is actually a very professional choice for some things people think they need Adobe products for. And it looks like Krita has CMYK support. Giving Krita more attention that it deserves would be welcome.

          • trougnouf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            There are open models that one can download on HuggingFace and run locally, but they are not as good as ChatGPT4 which has had insane® amounts of resources thrown at.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              But don’t we have to go through openai for gpt anyhow? Always have a browser for that.

              • trougnouf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I don’t understand your question. GPT is proprietary and hosted by OpenAI. There are other large language models (LLM) that one can download (or even train if they are open-source or at least have a descriptive scientific paper and open training data) and host themselves, but they are not as powerful.

                • Mango@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  So there’s no advantage to having windows as opposed to Linux for using it.

      • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Security camera stuff is really lacking. The only good one is zoneminder. It mostly works but it breaks a lot.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve been trying to remember and watch all the old YouTube videos I loved before they disappear either completely or behind a paywall that I won’t pay.

      Let’s get some shoes. Let’s get some shoes. OMG! Shoes!

      All of that will be gone soon. Not just the space where people can let their creativity flow, but where there is nearly 2 decades of that kind of creativity archived.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I actually just went through my old favorites (that are still accessible) and downloaded them with jdownloader last weekend.

        • GluWu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          :( I should probably archive anything I ever enjoyed. I wish I had put more time into remembering what those all were, I was too busy just having fun. I had entirely forgotten about Liam Kyle Sullivan, including that was what his name was, until very recently. Muffins was uploaded in 2007, am I officially old? Pre2010 YouTube was so simple. I remember uploading runescape videos to YouTube before Google bought it.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Pretty much. Even if seemingly every website wasn’t diving into anti-user nonsense, things online don’t last forever. I think it’s worthwhile to make a backup of pretty much anything you feel is worth the effort and space.

            • GluWu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I wonder if I should put the effort into making a desktop and/or android UI that downloads every video you watch in a format you specify for archive(so you could watch in whatever res but archives in 1080 or lower for space). Fork something like free-tube and run python for yt-dlp to archive. It would just be a font end for existing back end, and would probably be less effort than manually downloading anything I feel important. Just delete anything I feel isn’t when it’s in the archive folder.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    If a service becomes shitty it is almost always due to corporate greed. It usually starts with data-mining your subscribers without their knowledge or consent. Then it moves on to making the service itself worse by introducing advertising and making changes to the interface that forces them to VIEW those ads instead of the content they came for.

  • TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    I often wonder: can we start over? Like, can we just do MySpace again?..or have another YouTube that’s like before Google bought it? If we hate how tech bros have destroyed the fun, is there a way to redux the pre-tech bro wonder years?

      • Clot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        while peertube is a solution, and I really hope it succeeds, the content and creators arent there, anyways we can always use piped.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I often wonder: can we start over?

      No. All services that don’t enshittify will be outcompeted by services that do.

      The love of money is the root of many evils.

    • JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Even if a great new service or product comes along it alway just gets bought out by somme billionaire

      • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not necessarily. The Free and Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) movement is a thing. Most of the Fediverse is FLOSS, and I doubt there’s anyone who can take Lemmy or Mastodon closed source and buy every instance and then stop pop-up instances. It does require quite a bit of work, though, so it is difficult.

        I think the real challenging thing is that a great FLOSS service needs to attract attention and care. When I bring up Fediverse/FLOSS alternatives to software my friends complain about, I’m met with lukewarm-at-best reactions, generally due to networking effects (I think).

      • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the Fediverse is not doomed any time soon. In other areas XMPP is an example of an open source software based protocol since long and still being around, with active projects, and attempts to make things easier, like Snikket : https://snikket.org

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Me personally I have just accepted this is the way it is going to be. The company makes a good product and then it stops making a good product, I move on.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      If everyone who complained about ads in Prime and Netflix canceled their accounts, then Prime and Netflix would be motivated to remove their ads.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        The minute I got the prime notification I went and canceled immediately. And same with Netflix, I wish more people would do the same.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Wouldn’t this also cause them to charge more to make up for lost paying customers? 🤔

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Certainly possible, but there is a limit to what they can charge before losing customers on price as well as on principle.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Fr the longest time, I got Prime because of Prime. The ebooks and videos were just an included bonus. The bonus going to shit doesn’t change what the original decision was based on.

        Prime video has been on this road for a long time, as videos with ads took o paver more and more of its Home Screen. It got more and more annoying clicking past the clutter of “FreeVee” videos to find stuff I wanted to watch, but I guess it’s all stuff to click past now

  • realitista@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    Until governments get serious about trust busting, it will keep happening. Companies that don’t have to compete enshittify.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Monopolies don’t matter in this case. The market has been saturated. Nearly everyone pays for a streaming service; probably 2 or 3. There are no “new customers” so all that’s left is to squeeze existing customers even more.

      Same things happened with Peloton. Pretty much everyone that would buy their products have and they’re not buying a second bike or treadmill, so they introduced tiers of service. Pay more or you get fewer features.

      This is what capitalism demands. Ever increasing profits by any means necessary.

      • realitista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If the market was competitive, people would just choose another product or service that didn’t use such practices as you can clearly be profitable without doing this.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’ll only get “competition” in the streaming space if you could eliminate most or all of the exclusive content. You want to switch to send the message you’re unhappy but you’d probably be just as unhappy or moreso with a service that has nothing you care to watch.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    It was coming for absolutely everything since 2013 at least.

    I will never forget the day when Creative Suite was no longer a thing. I will never forget the day when Apple flattened iOS. I will never forget the day when the Xbox One was announced.

    Can you believe their modern products are basically a continuation of what they started back in 2013? This is why it’s the worst year of all time.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m like 99% sure “enshittification” is just a code word for “capitalism”

    *subscribe to unlock this article *

    Make that 100% sure.

  • stockRot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    How has healthcare software like MyChart been enshittified? It’s probably the tech I care the most about and the tech no one seems to talk about.

    • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I would love to see someone discuss any enshitification trends with EHR software, as well as any initiatives to bolster FOSS stuff like OSCAR for hospital use cases (far as I know, it’s pretty much just used at the clinic level, with more and more uptake of proprietary solutions for that use case as well here in Canada [obligatory Fuck Telus]).

      https://fammed.mcmaster.ca/oscar-emr/

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wish it wouldn’t come to products… I understand the need to make a profit, but it shouldn’t come at the cost of landfilling perfectly good hardware. I’d love just an affordable tablet with 5+ years of updates and an unlocked boot loader maybe with NO battery, and just a USB

  • mydude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Enshitification only comes for the things capitalism touches… So yeah, everything…

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Enshitification comes because of the unsustainable growth required by Capitalism in order to appease shareholders. Line must always go up!

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Enshittification comes from failure of government to establish a market where capitalism acts for the benefit of society. It comes from failure of antitrust regulations, failure of consumer protections, failure of broadcaster fairness doctrine, failure to reward a sustainable business model rather than simply maximizing quarterly profit, failure to support public broadcasting, failure to mandate ethics/honesty/transparency, failure to incent public good such environmental responsibility.