• Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    restricting corporations from purchases, banning Airbnb (yes, they drive prices up, and if you use them, you are contributing to it), penalizing if unit is not occupied (though enforcement of this will be hard), or banning foreign investors.

    Agreed, we should be doing all of those things. Corporations should not be able to own any kind of housing at all, and multi unit buildings should be under non-profit co-ops.

    And to penalize unoccupied housing, we should have a georgist taxation system.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only time it makes sense for me for a corporation to own a residence is if they have a need to put up their own employees in that area regularly, or if I needed a manager living on site (like some storage facilities have). Corporations should not make their money renting or buying/selling single family homes.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think there are enough such edge cases for it to make sense for it to be legal.

        If a corp needs an employee to be that close, then they should hire local, and/or rotate staff.

        At a bare minimum, I agree, no corp should profit off of housing.

    • throwwyacc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure I’d agree that corporate ownership is necessarily bad If you want to rent an apartment because you don’t want to buy into a co-op then how do you go about this? Someone needs to own the apartment to rent to you Personally I don’t mind if that initial investment comes from a person or a corporation