• indomara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What terrifies me about this is that there are no regulations or laws in place that say how long this tech that is implanted into people must be supported. Those poor people who got the bionic eye implants are now left with no replacement parts or support after the company went under, leaving those with implants that still work seeing with borrowed time.

    https://spectrum.ieee.org/bionic-eye-obsolete

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      My car isn’t even getting updates anymore and it’s fewer than ten years old. I’ll never put tech in my body until it’s legally required to be supported, and also open source so I can support it

      • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder if companies should be forced to provide a product’s core tech diagrams, material science, and major code base revisions to a kind of escrow, which is then released when the product is sunsetted.

        • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would be ideal. If you’re not going to support it anymore, then you shouldn’t be allowed to keep the knowledge of it locked up.