Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love a good protest … But this isn’t a good protest.

    What’s the most important thing?” they shouted. “Art, or right to a healthy and sustainable food?”

    Yeah, no. I think in a civilised world we should be able to have both and that sort of argument is weak as fuck.

    Destroy all art because it is more important that we conduct research into cot death. Oxygen is more important than art and yet look at you, with your galleries.

    It’s infantile posturing of probably well off middle class kids who want their Rosa Parks moment for Instagram clout.

    Further to that, attempting to destroy something that essentially belongs to everyone is just going to bring negative press. How about going after something owned by the head of Nestle? No? Is that too difficult and requires too much work?

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      And what did you do this week to prevent environmental destruction, recycle some sody pop cans?

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are talking about it right now.

      That means it worked, regardless of how “good” you think it is.

      • adam_y@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are talking about the protest, not the subject of the protest.

        That’s one of the problem with protest stunts. They get attention but often the attention drowns out the intent.

          • adam_y@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair question.

            I haven’t protested about this specific issue, but I have done about others. Specifically, the erosion of human rights in the UK.

            Here’s a video of a performance protest we made last year:

            Au

            It’s pretty blunt, it’s about how wealth is used to distort rights and the meanings of language. The full thing took over four hours to read out. We held a talk and a symposium as well as educational visits with schools. I’m a big believer in education as social justice.

            Hypothetically then, in their case, I would make art that engaged with the subject. Just like picasso did with Guernica, an image that still resonates the horror of war.