Tesla braces for its first trial involving Autopilot fatality::Tesla Inc is set to defend itself for the first time at trial against allegations that failure of its Autopilot driver assistant feature led to death, in what will likely be a major test of Chief Executive Elon Musk’s assertions about the technology.

  • tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Although it’s far from perfect, autopilot gets into a lot less accidents per mile than drivers without autopilot.

    They have some statistics here: https://www.tesla.com/VehicleSafetyReport

    EDIT: As pointed out by commenters in this thread, autopilot is mainly used on high ways, whereas the crash average is on all roads. Also Tesla only counts a crash if the airbag was deployed, but the numbers they compared against count every crash, including the ones without deployed airbags.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah, potentially cherrypicked statistics straight from Tesla. I’ll believe those statistics when they come from someone not with a horse in the race to adopt autonomous vehicles.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s been reported that the FSD statistics they put out are worthless because it tends to disable itself right before collisions.

    • decerian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those stats are misleading though. Autopilot only runs on highways, which are much safer per mile even for human drivers.

      Tesla are basically comparing their system, which only runs in pristine, ideal conditions, against an average human that has to deal with the real world.

      As far as I’m aware they haven’t released safety per mile data from the FSD cars yet, and until they do I will remain skeptical about how much safer it currently is.

      • Asifall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It actually would be really hard to get an unbiased estimate of safety given the current systems, because the data is inherently cherry picked by drivers who can switch the feature on/off depending on how complex the driving task is. What a simple number like crashes per mile really measures is really how likely FSD drivers are to overestimate the system’s ability plus some unknown base rate of unavoidable accidents.

        Probably the only way to control for this is looking at cars that are fully autonomous door to door and aren’t limited to pre-selected roads/areas. I don’t know that anyone is even doing that sort of testing.

      • tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmm you’re right about autopilot mainly being used on highways and those roads are a lot safer. I’ll edit my main comment

    • MajesticSloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This reminds me when you google if a certain company or product is good or legit and the top one is posted from the companies website.