• Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Thanks for caring about my privacy, CNN, sorry I couldn’t be more helpful in facilitating your solid privacy measures.

  • BlanK0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lmao, “required componentes to protect your privacy” 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You see what they’re actually doing there?

      “We are by law forced to give you the option to view our ads and accept our tracking, because of privacy legislation in your region. Since you are hindering us from doing so, you can’t come to the birthday party”.

      Ok, thank you EU, I suppose! :)

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        11 months ago

        Pretty sure CNN is (willfully) misinterpreting the law. The EU is definitely not prohibiting them from just turning off the tracking without providing a choice.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hahaha! “We need access to your private data to protect your privacy.” We’ve come full circle.

  • roscoe@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Turning off Java script worked when this happened to me. Firefox and ublock origin. It breaks some things but you can do it on a per site basis.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    CNN Management: I’m worried that since our purchase by a right-wing nut job and our spectacular idiot explosion of the last CEO, that we’re still in danger of being considered a valid corporate news outlet. What can we do?

    CNN Schmuck: We could force mandatory tracking and ads on all website visitors.

    CNN Management: Brilliant!

    toilet flushing noises

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        An interesting note-

        Another issue is that Strict mode is used by roughly 0.5% of Brave’s users, with the rest using the default setting, which is the Standard mode.

        This low percentage actually makes these users more vulnerable to fingerprinting despite them using the more aggressive blocker, because they constitute a discernible subset of users standing out from the rest.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s what I’ve always said, you got no out, if youre a big black blob on the map, the connections show exactly who you are.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Fingerprinting is tricky, you have to be as big standard as possible. Ironically privacy plugins make you more identifiable sometimes

  • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m a noob… But hear me out. Does anyone make a browser extension that fools the site into thinking you’ve accepted the cookie(s) when you really haven’t?

  • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    CNN might be the only site I’ve seen that actually checks if you have made a cookie choice then. The whole cookie acceptance thing is dumb, but they are following the law.

    Thankfully there is a plan that EU will make changes fo current policy so those popups might go away.