• prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Well get used to it as the Supreme Court has begun to lay down the precedent needed to completely do away with Chevron deference.

    In other words, they’re doing away with the authority that gives federal regulatory agencies their purview to set regulations. You know, the public servants who have dedicated their lives/educations/careers/etc. to a field of study?

    They’re replacing those decisions with ones made by judges and politicians.

    I much prefer “bureaucrats” (literally just another word for those public servants) make those decisions rather than billionaires and politicians.

        • Delta_V@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not necessarily. Its just about impossible to fire someone from a government job, even if they’ve demonstrated incompetence and lack of expertise.

          • DrPop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve seen plenty walked out the door in my days off working my field in government. At the bargaining level it is hard for an employee to be fired but not impossible and it takes repeat offenses but this is just my own experience in my field. The worst that could happen is someone gets is someone gets information they were not suppose to (UNAX). They handle that on a case by case basis. You don’t want a worker that can be fired at the drop of a hat when working for the public.

    • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      good. Enforcement should not decide law. that is a clear conflict of interest, in their favor. For an extreme example, you absolutely don’t want a police officer deciding citizen’s rights.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So you’re okay with a politician with no knowledge, process, expectations, or regulation in the area in question making things like medical decisions based only on political lines for you instead of a bureaucracy of beurocrats and medical professionals who dedicate their lives and careers to solving these problems?

        How does this make any sense?

        These organizations literally formed because politicians are incompetent towards these problems, and gathering of experts are required to evaluate, developer effective process, and then solve for them.