AI-Generated George Carlin Drops Comedy Special That Daughter Speaks Out Against: ‘No Machine Will Ever Replace His Genius’::Stand-up comedian George Carlin has been brought back to life in an artificial intelligence-generated special called ‘I’m Glad I’m Dead.’

  • Arkaelus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This must be the absolute epitome of this AI replication poor taste… The person who thought it would be a good idea to do this with Carlin, probably the one human who hated human bullshit more than anyone else to have ever existed, is either so out of touch they don’t even vibrate at the same frequency as the rest of existence, or so far up their own ass that they’re staring at their pancreas… An absolutely disgusting move.

    • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or they’re smart by trying to create outrage and generate those tasty clicks

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d imagine there’s a skit to make ironising the whole situation, but I’m not sure anyone can pull it off just like him, or at all. Not this random guy refurbishing his older material to make a fake guest appearance. Before all his punchlines were days of hard work, and it would be twice of that to correctly mimick his style, gestures, sense of humor and guess what he’d say now. It’d be lovely to see a talented impersonator to try that, and using AI like that is just selling this guy cheap. He deserves a better homage if there’s one needed, and not pushed like that for promotion and without contacting his family.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “I just want to let you know very clearly that what you’re about to hear is not George Carlin. It’s my impersonation of George Carlin that I developed in the exact same way a human impressionist would"

    No, was not developed in the exact same way a human would work, because it’s not human. Should we let pitching machines play pro baseball now, just because they can throw any pitch with pinpoint control?

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      Should we let pitching machines play pro baseball now, just because they can throw any pitch with pinpoint control?

      This is how we end up with Blernsball

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        The blerns are loaded, the count’s three blerns and two anti-blerns and the infield blern rule is in effect, right?

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      False analogy falacy. Comparing AI impersonation to pitching machines in pro baseball involves dissimilar contexts and functionalities.

      AI-based tools makes creating certain content easier, why being pissed at that? The guy who created the imperson clearly stated that the content was AI generated so there is no intended deception. He even wrote the script himself.

      It’s like being pissed at a baker for using an electric dough kneader instead of his hands to make bread, as it’s not made in the exact same way a human would work.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not the exact same way, but it’s still essentially the same outcome. Your pitching machine example doesn’t make sense because AI doesn’t do anything with pinpoint control.

      This objection is similar to saying photography isn’t an art form; all you do is point and press a button. In reality there is a lot more to it than that.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m not here to rage about the whole human vs machine thing because I honestly don’t give two shits. However, this isn’t very good. The pacing feels like George Carlin, but that’s about it. It’s really more like an edgy Ryan Reynolds.

    • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I disagree. It’s actually pretty good. Hopefully some people will be outraged enough to actually listen to it.

      The joke structure is 100% Carlin’s. The delivery is almost perfect. The message is spot-on.

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        As someone who’s consumed every album and special George Carlin produced, it felt like someone retelling their memory of some of his bits. Like regurgitation. It’d be impressive if your nephew performed this at his thirteenth birthday party after becoming obsessed with Carlin.

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’d be impressive if your nephew performed this at his thirteenth birthday party after becoming obsessed with Carlin.

          Given modern generative large language models are still about a decade away from a thirteenth birthday, this is pretty impressive then.

          Does anyone remember the Seinfeld AI generation in 2022?

          Do we really think this tech is going to stop here and not improve at all after such rapid growth in the past two years?

          By the time of its thirteenth birthday I suspect it’s going to have gotten much better at writing jokes.

      • Sekrayray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Agree. It was fun to hear. The bit around 37 mins about what it’s like being dead was fun

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is so tragicomedically the opposite of everything that Carlin was about in so many ways that it’s difficult to fully comprehend

  • Jordan117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I listened to it and it’s genuinely not bad (on a content and voice synthesis level), to the point that I have a hard time believing it was entirely AI-generated. If it’s not a fake ghostwritten by the creators, it must have been heavily rerolled and edited to make it so coherent.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I listened to it and it’s genuinely not bad

      Of course not. Its predicated on the collected works of a decades-long professional comedian.

      If you re-mixed a new screenplay using the combined works of Shakespeare (and called it, idk, West Side Story or 10 Things I Hate About You or The Lion King) you could put together a blockbuster movie fairly easily, too.

      If it’s not a fake ghostwritten by the creators, it must have been heavily rerolled and edited to make it so coherent.

      The rise of ‘pseudo-AI’: how tech firms quietly use humans to do bots’ work

      • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Mechanical turk” jobs are way more hellish than any realistic AI dystopia, even though some AI developments use MTurks

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Why do all of the comments make it seem like people think that someone asked chatgpt to write a George Carlin routine or whatever? A human person, not a computer, wrote some comedy in (what they felt) was in the style of George Carlin. The technology portion of this was the cloning of Carlin’s voice to “perform” the routine. And you can feel however you want about either part of that. I mean, seems like you’d have to be pretty far up your own ass to think you can just put your own words into the mouth of someone else, especially someone who is no longer in a position to call you a fucking idiot, or not. But the story that people are commenting on, sure seems to be quite different to the actual events that occurred.

    As far as the actual story, they know what they did. They know full well that they could have actually did a Carlin impersonation if they had wanted. They could have written their material, went up on stage, said exactly want they were doing, performed their bit, dressed up for the part, hitting as many of the mannerisms as they could. A real, actual, proper attempt at an impersonation. They could have done that, and almost no one would have cared. A few people might have been upset about it, as there always are. But largely, no one would have batted an eye.

    But they didn’t do that. They did this. They did this, knowing full well that the claim of it being an “impersonation” was bullshit. And knowing full well what the response would be. And it was exactly the response they wanted. All of the attention and outrage they are getting directed at them right now? That was the point.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Honestly he’s a fairly offensive choice as a first target for this sort of venture, but I haven’t watched the thing yet. Doesn’t seem likely it’ll be full of the cutting political satire we associate with him, and the jokes I’ve seen posted from it are tepid af.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    “No Machine Will Ever Replace His Genius”

    OK, but it’s the closest that we can get at the moment.