Billionaire CEOs were quick to sing the praises of working from home at the start of the pandemic, calling it the way of the future — but over the last three years, they’ve slowly changed their tune.

Late last year, Forbes reported that 90% of companies will return to the office in 2024, with 28% threatening to fire workers who don’t comply.

But it turns out that the motivations for calling workers back to the office may have less to do with employee productivity or profit margins and everything to do with catering to the egos of controlling managers who want their workers back, according to a recent study published by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh.

Mark Ma, an associate professor of business administration from Pitt’s Katz Graduate School of Business, who led the study, told BI he started the research hoping to understand why some S&P 500 firms want employees to return to the office while other firms avoid calling them back.

“One of the most common arguments management suggests is that they want to return to office because employee productivity is low at home, and they believe returns to office would help firms improve performance and ultimately improve the firm’s value,” Ma told BI. “That’s the reason they give — but our results actually do not support these arguments.”

  • Beryl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What’s even more stupid about return to office is that we know that commuting is a major contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. So working from home would not only be an improvement in work conditions, sparing millions of individuals hours of wasted commuting time each week, it would also be an easy way to reduce pollution and mitigate global warming.

    Laws should be passed that mandate employees can work from home whenever it cannot be demonstrated by the company that being on site is absolutely necessary to do the job.

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you look around, fast food places and Pepsico and everyone price gouging, it’s a race to the bottom for a last cash-grab before what appears to be an inevitable recession – brought on by some of these same conglomerates. Mass layoffs (tech sector over 250k layoffs last year across the board), among inflation just murdering people’s wallets. Credit card debt is over 1 trillion now, people are “surviving” off of high interest debt to maintain life at this point, but it’s not sustainable at current rates.

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        We are witnessing companies engage in late stage capitalist practices because we are in late stage capitalism. Unfortunately I don’t see us flipping to socialism, so Imo were heading towards recession, depression, and collapse, all while the climate continues to fuck us.

        • zzzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          all while the climate continues to fuck us.

          To be fair, I believe the consensus is that we fucked the climate first.

            • MeatPilot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Climate change is a power bottom.

              We thought we were the dom in the relationship and all the sudden the climate just handcuffed us to the bed post and jammed a cold hard unlubricated steel butt plug up our ass and gave us a golden shower without telling us the safe word to stop it.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not so big on the dictator for life and beyond part, we can do better than that, why not a socialist democracy?

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              11 months ago

              You wanted socialism. Can’t have socialism without a dictatorship.

              • Nudding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Oh, you’ve been propagandized against an economic arrangement, that must feel strange. Hopefully capitalism will save you 🙄

                • Aux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Yeah, after growing up in communism, I’m pretty happy with capitalism.

                  • Nudding@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I’m happy for you. Sounds like you’ve got a lot more to learn about it though lol.

    • cottonmon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      The other stupid part is that WFH makes more sense from a business perspective. Having to pay less in office rent and utilities is great for saving on costs.

    • Ironfist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not only that, less people driving means less people buying gas, which drives the gas price down as we saw during the pandemic. When the gas price goes down, everything is cheaper. This could be a great way to get a bit of relief on the inflation.