Hope this isn’t a repeated submission. Funny how they’re trying to deflect blame after they tried to change the EULA post breach.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’re right. It the customer’s fault for giving them the data in the first place.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      But hear me out, I have no control over my cousin or aunt or some random relative getting one of these tests and now this shitty company has a pretty good idea what a large chunk of my DNA looks like. If people from both sides of my family do it they have an even better idea what my genetic profile looks like. That’s not my fault, I never consented to it, and it doesn’t seem ok.

    • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      If your credit card information gets stolen because someone stole it from a website you bought something off of, is that your fault?

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I can change my credit card. I can’t change my dna. This wasn’t even for any medical reasons. 23andme is just a vanity service.

        • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          And what of the money lost? Should the credit card company say “well you’re an idiot that gave sensitive information to some company, we’re not going to help you?” It’s still victim blaming.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            In reality, yes. If the data breach because users were reusing passwords, then they are partially at fault. If someone gets rear ended by a drunk driver and their injuries could have been limited by by wearing a seatbelt, then yes. They are partially at fault for it. People who don’t wear their seatbelts are the same types that reuse passwords. They don’t think it will happen to them and take their luck up to that point for granted.

        • Case@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I have a relative who did it.

          But they are super into genealogy.

          At this point, to go deeper, they would need to learn a new language and travel half way across the world.

          I was not consulted before this was done. I would have cautioned against it.

      • spacesatan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Bad analogy. The only people who had their information exposed are people who reused passwords and people who decided to make their info semi-public. It’s more like deciding to tell all your cousins and 2nd cousins your credit card info and one of them leaked it.

    • JIMMERZ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Absolutely; and this is another example in a long list which should serve as a lesson for people to not share their personal data with any company if possible. Yet, I feel that lesson will never be learned.